T vs VZ — Dividend & DRIP Comparison
Side-by-side live data and DRIP projection for AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc..
- Price
- $24.80
- Forward yield
- 4.48%
- 5Y dividend CAGR
- -11.80%
- 5Y price growth
- -3.30%
- Frequency
- quarterly
- Price
- $47.81
- Forward yield
- 5.78%
- 5Y dividend CAGR
- 1.95%
- 5Y price growth
- -3.25%
- Frequency
- quarterly
Key metrics
| Metric | T | VZ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 4.48% | 5.78% | +1.31pp VZ |
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -11.80% | 1.95% | — |
| 5Y share-price CAGR | -3.30% | -3.25% | +0.05pp VZ |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly | — |
| Expense ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% | — |
| Strategy | AT&T — US telecom, post-2022 dividend cut, high current yield | Verizon — US telecom, sustained mid-single-digit dividend growth | — |
| Tax treatment | Qualified (most) | Qualified (most) | — |
| AUM | — | — | — |
| Inception | Nov 1983 | Jul 2000 | — |
Historical — $10,000 invested 10 years ago
| T | VZ | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial shares purchased | 307.2 | 177.7 | — |
| DRIP shares accumulated | +299.4 | +125.2 | +174.1 T |
| End shares | 606.5 | 303.0 | — |
| End share price | $25 | $48 | — |
| End value (with DRIP) | $15,042 | $14,486 | +$557 T |
| Total return (no DRIP) | 26.43% | 29.85% | — |
| Total return (with DRIP) | 50.42% | 44.86% | — |
| Total CAGR (with DRIP) | 4.17% | 3.78% | — |
| Cumulative dividends paid | $5,025 | $4,487 | — |
| Yield on cost (today) | 6.73% | 8.38% | — |
Project both into the future
Dividend behavior
How they differ
AT&T and Verizon are the two dominant U.S. wireless carriers, and both carry yields that attract income investors — but they arrive at those yields through very different dividend histories. Verizon's forward yield is approximately 5.96%, supported by a five-year dividend growth rate of roughly 1.95%. That slow-but-positive growth reflects a telecom company that held its dividend through a period of heavy 5G capital expenditure and debt. AT&T's forward yield is approximately 4.62%, but its five-year DGR is approximately -11.8%, reflecting the significant dividend cut the company made in 2022 following the spin-off of its WarnerBros. Discovery media assets. On a five-year share price basis, both have seen negative SPG: VZ at approximately -4.36% and T at approximately -5.20%.
The post-cut dynamic matters for how each should be interpreted. AT&T's current dividend is deliberately sized to be sustainable at its reduced level, and the company has expressed intent to focus on debt reduction and wireless network investment rather than aggressive dividend increases. The lower payout ratio following the cut means there is room for modest future growth from a reset baseline. Verizon's dividend was never cut, which is meaningful for investors prioritizing continuity — but the very modest 1.95% five-year growth rate reflects how little room its high payout ratio and debt load leave for increases.
Both companies pay quarterly and operate in a mature, capital-intensive sector where free cash flow generation is constrained by ongoing network spending. Neither is positioned for rapid dividend growth in the near term; the investment case for both rests primarily on sustaining current yields rather than compounding income through growth.
T fits investors focused on higher current yield and a recovery story as debt paydown improves financial flexibility post-reset. VZ suits those who prioritize an unbroken dividend track record and steady, if slow, income continuity.
About
AT&T — US telecom, post-2022 dividend cut, high current yield
- Issuer
- AT&T Inc.
- Inception
- Nov 21, 1983
- Expense ratio
- 0.00%
- Payout
- Quarterly
Verizon — US telecom, sustained mid-single-digit dividend growth
- Issuer
- Verizon Communications
- Inception
- Jul 3, 2000
- Expense ratio
- 0.00%
- Payout
- Quarterly