DIVO Dividend Calculator
Dividend growth rate (CAGR)
| Year | Yield | Div / share | Annual income | Yield on cost | Cumulative income | Portfolio value | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.7% | $2.23 | $489.00 | 3.9% | $489.00 | $13,434 | 281.05 |
| 2 | 4.8% | $2.39 | $670.86 | 4.5% | $1,160 | $17,219 | 343.79 |
| 3 | 4.9% | $2.55 | $878.07 | 5.1% | $2,038 | $21,397 | 407.72 |
| 4 | 5.0% | $2.73 | $1,114 | 5.7% | $3,152 | $26,016 | 473.12 |
| 5 | 5.1% | $2.92 | $1,383 | 6.3% | $4,536 | $31,131 | 540.32 |
| 6 | 5.2% | $3.13 | $1,691 | 6.9% | $6,226 | $36,805 | 609.66 |
| 7 | 5.3% | $3.35 | $2,041 | 7.6% | $8,267 | $43,109 | 681.50 |
| 8 | 5.4% | $3.58 | $2,441 | 8.4% | $10,709 | $50,124 | 756.25 |
| 9 | 5.5% | $3.83 | $2,899 | 9.2% | $13,607 | $57,942 | 834.33 |
| 10 | 5.6% | $4.10 | $3,422 | 10.1% | $17,029 | $66,670 | 916.20 |
Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)
Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.
Historical dividends per share
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Cash amount | TTM yield | Fwd yield | Share price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | $0.18 | 6.5% | 4.8% | $45.13 |
| 2026-03-30 | $0.18 | 6.6% | 4.9% | $44.00 |
| 2026-02-26 | $0.19 | 6.6% | 4.8% | $46.73 |
| 2026-01-29 | $0.18 | 6.7% | 4.8% | $45.68 |
| 2025-12-30 | $0.95 | 6.4% | 25.5% | $44.83 |
| 2025-11-26 | $0.21 | 5.0% | 5.7% | $45.30 |
| 2025-10-30 | $0.18 | 4.5% | 4.8% | $45.09 |
| 2025-09-29 | $0.18 | 4.5% | 4.8% | $44.49 |
| 2025-08-28 | $0.17 | 5.0% | 4.8% | $43.60 |
| 2025-07-30 | $0.17 | 4.6% | 4.8% | $42.80 |
| 2025-06-27 | $0.17 | 4.7% | 4.8% | $42.23 |
| 2025-05-29 | $0.17 | 5.1% | 4.8% | $41.11 |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of last 12 months of payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.
About DIVO
DIVO — the Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF — is an actively managed dividend-and-options income fund issued by Amplify ETFs with Capital Wealth Planning (CWP) as the subadviser. Launched in December 2016, DIVO holds a concentrated portfolio of approximately twenty-five high-quality US large-cap dividend-paying stocks and overlays a tactical, actively managed covered-call writing program on selected positions within that basket. The strategy is explicitly hybrid: the equity sleeve looks like a quality-dividend large-cap portfolio (mature payers, often with multi-decade dividend-growth histories), and the options overlay layers a premium-harvesting income stream on top through selectively written covered calls on individual positions rather than mechanically writing calls on the whole basket or on a broad index. The result is a fund that produces a monthly distribution combining underlying dividend yield with selectively harvested option premium, at a yield level meaningfully below the mechanical covered-call ETFs (QYLD, XYLD) but above pure-dividend ETFs (SCHD, VYM).
DIVO uses an active selective covered-call overlay — not a mechanical one. This is the structural feature that distinguishes DIVO from the mechanical covered-call ETFs and from the actively managed broad-market covered-call ETFs. The subadviser (CWP) selects which individual positions within the twenty-five-stock basket to write calls on at any given time, chooses the strike price and expiration tenor of each option based on the manager's view of each name's near-term technical setup and the option-market premium environment, and rolls or closes positions on a discretionary basis rather than on a fixed monthly cycle. The covered-call coverage at any time is partial — typically only a subset of the twenty-five positions has active short calls, with the remainder held outright — and the strikes are typically written above the current price rather than at-the-money, which preserves more equity upside than an at-the-money write would. The premium yield generated by the overlay is therefore lower per dollar of equity than QYLD's mechanical at-the-money strategy would produce on the same basket, but the equity upside retained is correspondingly higher.
The structural consequence of DIVO's selective active overlay is that the fund's behavior in different market environments sits between pure-dividend ETFs and mechanical covered-call ETFs. In a strong bull market, DIVO's selectively written calls cap upside on the covered subset of positions but the uncovered positions and the above-strike portion of covered positions continue to participate in price appreciation — the fund captures meaningfully more upside than QYLD or XYLD would on the same basket, at the cost of a lower headline premium yield. In a flat or sideways market, the selective overlay collects premium on the covered positions without surrendering meaningful upside (since the basket isn't moving much anyway), and the dividend income from all twenty-five positions continues unchanged — the fund operates near its design point in this environment. In a bear market, the selective overlay provides a partial cushion on the covered positions (the call premiums offset some of the price decline), the uncovered positions decline in line with the equity market, and the underlying dividend stream from the twenty-five names provides some baseline income through the drawdown.
How DIVO pays distributions
DIVO distributes monthly. The ex-dividend date typically falls in the second or third week of each calendar month, with the pay date following a few business days later. The per-share cash amount each month is a blend of the underlying dividend income collected from the twenty-five-stock equity basket (smoothed across the year by the fund's monthly distribution cadence) and the option premium collected from the selective covered-call overlay during the prior cycle. The blend ratio is not fixed — in periods of high implied volatility on the underlying names, the option-premium portion of the distribution grows; in periods of low implied volatility, the underlying-dividend portion dominates. Over a calendar year, the aggregate distribution averages out to a mid-single-digit to high-single-digit yield on NAV, depending on the volatility regime and the manager's coverage decisions across the year.
DIVO's distribution composition is a mix of qualified dividends (from the underlying equity basket, where the named US large-caps meet the standard holding-period rules), ordinary income (from option-premium-related short-term gains and option-premium accruals where the option lifecycle does not produce qualified-dividend treatment), and potentially small components of return of capital depending on the fund's realized gains and losses across the year. The year-end 1099-DIV reports the exact split, and the relative proportions can shift meaningfully year to year depending on how active the option overlay has been and on the fund's realized capital gains and losses inside the wrapper. Holders in taxable accounts should expect a mixed-character distribution that is partially favorable (the qualified-dividend portion) and partially less favorable (the ordinary-income and ROC portions) relative to a pure-dividend ETF. Tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, Roth IRA, 401(k)) shelter the entire distribution and the character split becomes irrelevant inside the wrapper.
The expense ratio on DIVO is moderate-to-high among dividend-income ETFs — higher than the lowest-cost passive dividend funds (SCHD, VYM, HDV) and roughly comparable to other actively managed dividend-and-options funds. The compounding drag over a multi-decade horizon is meaningful at the long end of a DCA-plus-DRIP framework but is partially offset by the active manager's ability to adjust both the equity basket and the overlay strategy as market conditions change. The fund has navigated multiple market regimes since its 2016 inception (the 2018 volatility window, the 2020 COVID demand shock, the 2022 rate-shock drawdown, and the 2023-24 recovery) with the distribution stream continuing through each window, though the per-share amount has varied with the volatility environment and the manager's coverage decisions.
Who DIVO suits
DIVO suits investors who want a hybrid dividend-and-option-income product, prefer monthly cash flow, value the active manager's discretion in both the equity basket selection and the option-overlay execution, and accept the moderate-to-high expense ratio as the cost of active management. The fund is structurally between SCHD (pure equity dividends, no overlay) and JEPI/QYLD (covered-call dominant) on the income-versus-upside trade-off — the selective active overlay produces less option-premium income per dollar than the more aggressive covered-call funds but retains more equity upside in bull markets than they do. Investors who want pure dividend exposure with full upside participation should weight SCHD or VYM more; investors who want maximum option-premium-derived income at the cost of upside should weight QYLD or XYLD more; investors who want the hybrid approach with active discretion should weight DIVO.
DIVO versus JEPI versus QYLD is the comparison that maps the active-versus-mechanical covered-call ETF universe. QYLD is the mechanical reference point — write at-the-money one-month index calls on the full Nasdaq-100 basket every month, collect maximum mechanical premium, distribute, and accept the corresponding upside cap. JEPI is the diversified actively managed alternative — hold a separately managed US large-cap equity basket (not a full index) and write covered calls through equity-linked notes with strike selection and notional sizing left to the JPMorgan portfolio team, typically writing below-the-money or partial-coverage positions designed to retain more equity upside than QYLD's mechanical strategy. DIVO is the selective active alternative — hold a concentrated twenty-five-stock quality-dividend equity basket and write covered calls on selected individual positions at the CWP subadviser's discretion, with above-the-strike writes and partial coverage that retain meaningfully more equity upside than either QYLD or JEPI's broader overlays. The headline yield ranking typically runs QYLD highest, JEPI middle, DIVO lowest; the equity-upside-retention ranking runs in the opposite order. Investors choose among the three based on where they want to sit on the yield-versus-upside trade-off and on how much weight they place on active manager discretion versus mechanical rule transparency.
DIVO is held in both taxable and tax-advantaged accounts. In taxable accounts the mixed-character distribution produces a more complex tax outcome than a pure-dividend ETF would; in tax-advantaged accounts the wrapper neutralizes the character question entirely. The dividend calculator on this page can model DIVO using the current forward yield and a modest annual DGR consistent with the fund's historical pattern; given the actively managed and option-overlay-dependent nature of the distribution, a conservative DGR assumption (zero or low single digits) is more defensible than an aggressive one, and investors planning around a long horizon should run multiple scenarios to bracket the realistic range.
Hypothetical scenarios
Scenario 1: $50,000 in DIVO for monthly income with DRIP
Consider a hypothetical position of $50,000 in DIVO, held for monthly income with DRIP enabled. At a forward yield in the mid-single-digit-percentage-of-NAV range against the current per-share monthly rate, the starting annualized cash distribution on $50,000 is in the $2,500 to $3,000 range, paid in twelve monthly installments. With DRIP on, the reinvested distributions purchase additional shares each month, and the share count compounds steadily — the monthly cadence produces twelve reinvestment events per year rather than the four available to quarterly-paying funds, which marginally accelerates the share-count growth at the same yield.
The mechanics: each month the monthly distribution is reinvested at the current price, and the share count compounds across both the dividend portion and the option-premium portion of the distribution combined. DIVO's monthly cash amount is a blend of the underlying equity basket's dividend income and the covered-call premium harvested by the active overlay, with the blend ratio shifting across the year based on the volatility environment and the manager's coverage decisions. In high-volatility periods (post-shock recovery windows, earnings-season clusters) the option-premium component grows; in low-volatility periods the underlying-dividend component dominates. The aggregate distribution remains relatively steady month-over-month under most regimes because the active overlay can be adjusted to maintain a target distribution rate, but the structure is not deterministic and the per-share monthly amount can shift as conditions change.
The illustrative compounding picture across a multi-year window depends on the path of the underlying twenty-five-stock equity basket, on the realized option-premium yield from the selective overlay, and on the manager's coverage decisions across the period. In a flat-to-rising market with normal volatility, the share count compounds steadily and the per-share distribution stays near its starting level — DIVO operates near its design point in this environment. In a strong bull market, the underlying basket appreciates (boosting NAV), the selective overlay caps upside on some positions but not on others (retaining meaningfully more upside than mechanical at-the-money writers would), and the option-premium component of the distribution may be lower per dollar as the manager opts for less aggressive coverage to retain more equity participation. In a bear market, the underlying basket declines, the option premiums provide a partial cushion on the covered subset, and DRIP reinvests at lower prices which can favor long-term recovery on subsequent rallies. The calculator on this page produces a deterministic projection at the input yield and DGR; the actual realized outcome depends on the equity basket's path and on the volatility regime.
The honest planning takeaway is that DIVO's monthly cash flow is the primary value the fund delivers, with the active selective overlay providing some equity-upside retention that mechanical covered-call funds (QYLD) do not. The calculator output is a useful approximation of that cash flow over the holding window — provided the DGR is set conservatively given the option-overlay-dependent nature of part of the distribution. A zero or low-single-digit DGR is more defensible than a higher assumption for long-horizon planning around DIVO. Scenario 2 explores the comparison with the other major covered-call ETFs.
Scenario 2: DIVO versus JEPI versus QYLD — the active-versus-mechanical trade-off
Consider the structural comparison among the three actively-or-mechanically managed covered-call income ETFs at the same starting capital and contribution pattern. The three funds occupy three distinct positions on the income-versus-upside trade-off and on the active-versus-mechanical-management trade-off, and running the calculator across all three with the same dollar inputs produces three distinct projected income lines that illustrate the methodology differences in concrete terms.
QYLD writes at-the-money one-month index calls on the full Nasdaq-100 basket every month, mechanically — no discretionary strike selection, no partial coverage, no active management of the overlay beyond the standard monthly roll. The headline yield runs the highest of the three (typically in the low double digits), the option-premium component dominates the distribution (with NAV-erosion risk in bull markets being the structural cost), and the equity upside retention is near-zero on every monthly cycle because the strikes are at-the-money on the full basket. The calculator output at QYLD's higher starting yield with a zero DGR (the most defensible assumption given the historical NAV-erosion pattern) produces an income line that starts highest among the three but typically does not grow over the horizon.
JEPI holds a separately managed US large-cap equity basket (not a full index) and writes covered calls through equity-linked notes, with strike selection and notional sizing actively managed by the JPMorgan portfolio team. Typically the strategy writes below-the-money or partial-coverage positions designed to retain more equity upside than mechanical at-the-money writing — the result is a lower headline yield (typically in the high single digits) but more retained equity-side total-return potential. The calculator output at JEPI's middle starting yield with a low-single-digit DGR (conservative but defensible given the active management's ability to adjust through cycles) produces an income line in the middle of the three.
DIVO holds a concentrated twenty-five-stock quality-dividend equity basket and writes covered calls on selected individual positions at the CWP subadviser's discretion. The strikes are typically written above the current price rather than at-the-money, the coverage is partial (only a subset of positions has active short calls at any time), and the overlay is rolled or closed on a discretionary basis. The headline yield runs the lowest of the three (typically in the mid-single digits), and the equity-upside retention runs the highest — the underlying basket plus the uncovered portion plus the above-strike portion of covered positions continues to participate in market appreciation. The calculator output at DIVO's lower starting yield with a low-single-digit DGR (defensible given the active manager's ability to adjust the equity basket and the overlay) produces an income line that starts lowest among the three but may grow modestly over time as the equity basket's underlying dividend stream and the manager's active adjustments compound.
The structural lesson is that the three funds occupy three points on the same trade-off. QYLD maximizes headline yield at the cost of upside; JEPI moderates the headline-yield-for-upside trade through active diversified covered-call writing; DIVO minimizes the upside surrender at the cost of a lower headline yield through selective above-strike writing on a concentrated quality-dividend basket. The cumulative cash collected over a multi-year window depends on which environment the holding period encounters — flat-to-modestly-rising markets favor the higher-yield mechanical funds, strong bull markets favor the more upside-retaining selective funds, bear markets affect all three with the cushion magnitude varying by overlay structure. Investors who weight income level should weight QYLD more; investors who want a balance with active discretion should weight JEPI more; investors who want the equity-upside-retention with monthly income should weight DIVO more. As always, this content is educational only; the calculator output is a model based on user-supplied inputs, not a forecast of realized future outcomes.
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-05-15.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.