KMB logo

KMB Dividend Calculator

$97.605.25% fwd yield-5.58% 5-yr SPGclose 2026-05-29 · Polygon.io

Real-time refresh paused — values may lag.

Dividend growth rate (CAGR)

1Y: 3.28%2Y: 3.33%5Y: 3.32%10Y: 3.65%All: 4.18%
YearStart BalanceStart SharesShare PriceDividend / ShareDividend YieldYield on CostAnnual DividendTotal DividendsEnd SharesEnd Balance
1$10,000102.46$92.15$5.125.56%4.89%$606.33$606.33134.28$12,374
2$12,374134.28$87.01$5.296.08%5.43%$804.12$1,410170.20$14,810
3$14,810170.20$82.16$5.476.66%6.04%$1,039$2,449211.05$17,339
4$17,339211.05$77.57$5.657.29%6.72%$1,318$3,767257.82$20,000
5$20,000257.82$73.24$5.847.97%7.51%$1,651$5,418311.83$22,840
6$22,840311.83$69.16$6.038.72%8.42%$2,053$7,471374.73$25,915
7$25,915374.73$65.30$6.239.55%9.48%$2,540$10,011448.64$29,295
8$29,295448.64$61.65$6.4410.45%10.74%$3,135$13,146536.37$33,069
9$33,069536.37$58.21$6.6511.43%12.24%$3,867$17,013641.60$37,350
10$37,350641.60$54.97$6.8712.51%14.05%$4,777$21,790769.27$42,283
These numbers assume your starting yield, dividend growth rate, and share-price growth all hold for 10 years straight. Real markets don't work that way — companies cut dividends, ETFs change strategy, prices swing in ways the inputs above can't capture. Use this projection to compare scenarios (more contribution vs less, DRIP on vs off, 10 years vs 25), not as a number you'll see in your brokerage account.
DRIP gained you+$2,643 over 10 years
Loading projection chart…

S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.

Historical dividends per share

Loading dividend history chart…

Over the last 5 years, KMB's dividend grew 3.32%/yr and its share price grew -5.58%/yr. Forward yield: 5.20%. Yield drifted from 4.5% to 6.5%.

Based on dividends paid September 2011 to June 2026.

Recent dividends

Ex-dateCash amountTTM yieldFwd yieldShare price
2026-06-05$1.285.20%5.25%$97.60
2026-03-06$1.284.84%4.90%$104.58
2025-12-05$1.264.90%4.90%$102.96
2025-09-05$1.263.85%3.88%$129.89
2025-06-06$1.263.71%3.77%$133.55
2025-03-07$1.263.40%3.48%$144.79
2024-12-06$1.223.62%3.62%$134.73
2024-09-06$1.223.29%3.32%$146.91
2024-06-07$1.223.57%3.63%$134.48
2024-03-07$1.223.78%3.88%$125.90
2023-12-07$1.183.89%3.89%$121.49
2023-09-07$1.183.70%3.71%$127.13

Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.

About KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation — ticker KMB — is a US consumer staples manufacturer best known for a portfolio of personal-care and tissue brands that have been part of American households for generations. The company was founded in 1872 in Neenah, Wisconsin, and now trades on the NYSE with a market capitalization in the $40-45 billion range. KMB is a Dividend Aristocrat with a streak of more than fifty consecutive years of annual dividend increases, placing it in the same long-streak bracket as Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The streak began in the early 1970s and has continued through every recession, market crash, and global disruption since then. That continuity is the central reason KMB occupies a position in many income-focused portfolios despite recent stock-price weakness.

KMB operates in the Consumer Defensive sector, with revenue split across three operating segments. Personal Care accounts for roughly half of total revenue and includes the Huggies diaper franchise, Kotex feminine-care products, and Pull-Ups training pants — categories where KMB holds significant global market share. Consumer Tissue contributes about thirty percent of revenue through the Kleenex facial-tissue brand, Cottonelle bath tissue, Viva paper towels, and the Scott brand of value-tier paper products. K-C Professional, the third segment, accounts for the remaining twenty percent and sells Scott and Kleenex commercial tissue along with workplace-hygiene products to facilities, offices, and institutions rather than to retail consumers. Geographically, revenue is split roughly evenly between the United States and international markets, which introduces meaningful currency translation effects in any given quarter.

The margin profile sits in the middle of the consumer-staples cohort. Gross margins typically run in the thirty to thirty-two percent range — lower than CL's roughly sixty percent because tissue and diaper categories carry less pricing power than premium oral care, and consumer-tissue customers can substitute between private-label and branded options more readily than in toothpaste. Operating margins typically sit around seventeen percent. The payout ratio runs between fifty-five and seventy percent of earnings in a typical year, which is a sustainable range for a mature consumer staple but leaves less headroom for a downturn than a lower-payout name would carry. Credit-rating agencies have maintained KMB at investment-grade ratings throughout the streak. Expense ratio is not applicable to individual stocks — the figure you'll see in the calculator above is zero, since there is no fund wrapper between you and the underlying shares.

One structural development worth flagging directly. In 2024 KMB announced a major restructuring intended to separate the consumer-products business from the global supplier business — a multi-year process that may eventually affect the corporate structure under which dividends are paid. As of the most recent reporting period both pieces continue to operate under the KMB ticker and the dividend continues at the consolidated-company rate. How the eventual separation is structured — clean spinoff, partial divestiture, or alternative arrangement — and how dividend allocation is handled between the resulting entities are open questions that long-term holders should track. The historical streak applies to the consolidated KMB as it has existed since 1872; post-separation dividend continuity for either resulting business is a matter for future disclosure.

How KMB pays dividends

KMB pays cash dividends quarterly, on a March–June–September–December ex-date cadence with pay dates that fall on the first business day of the following month — typically April 1, July 1, October 1, and January 2. The board declares the per-share amount each quarter; the ex-dividend date typically falls in the first half of the third month of the quarter, and the pay date follows roughly two to three weeks later. Holders who own shares as of the close on the day before the ex-date receive the dividend; holders who buy on or after the ex-date wait for the next quarterly payment. On the ex-date the share price drops by approximately the distribution amount on the open, reflecting the fact that the company has paid the cash out of its balance sheet.

Holders who DRIP through their broker receive additional shares purchased at the prevailing market price around the pay date. Most major brokers offer fractional-share DRIP for KMB, so the full cash distribution is reinvested even when the per-share amount divided by the share price doesn't produce a whole number. The mechanics are identical to any other quarterly US dividend stock — there is no managed-distribution policy, no covered-call overlay, and no return of capital. The cash that funds the dividend comes from operating earnings: KMB collects revenue from personal-care, consumer-tissue, and K-C Professional sales, pays raw-material costs (pulp, packaging, freight), operating expenses, and taxes, services its debt, and the residual is available for capital return through the dividend and share repurchases.

Recent growth pattern: KMB has typically raised the quarterly per-share amount once per year, with the new rate taking effect on the first dividend payment following the announcement. The size of the annual hike has run in the low-single-digit range over the most recent five-year window — slower than the mid-single-digit pace some Aristocrats maintain, reflecting the input-cost pressure (pulp prices, packaging, freight) that has compressed margins through 2022-2024. Management has prioritized continuing the streak over accelerating the hike size, which is the structurally honest trade-off for a Dividend Aristocrat in a margin-pressured period. The calculator on this page uses the trailing five-year dividend growth rate to project the income line forward; you can override this with a custom growth rate if you want to model a more conservative or more optimistic path.

The current forward yield on KMB sits at the high end of the Dividend Aristocrat cohort. The structural source of that elevated yield is important to understand: it is not the product of accelerating dividend growth. The annual dividend hike has been modest, in line with the slow recent cadence. The elevated yield is the arithmetic result of share-price weakness — when the price denominator declines while the dividend numerator continues to grow, the yield ratio rises. The scenarios page covers this dynamic in detail. For purposes of the income projection on this page, the current yield is the relevant input for the year-one calculation; the long-term shape of the projection depends on whether the recent slow dividend-growth cadence continues or accelerates as input-cost pressure eventually normalizes.

Who KMB suits

KMB suits income-focused investors who want exposure to a long-streak Dividend Aristocrat at a point in the cycle when the price compression has produced an elevated entry yield. The current yield is meaningfully higher than KMB's own five-year average yield, and meaningfully higher than the yield typically available on broader-portfolio peers like PG. For a Path A dividend investor — a long-horizon holder who cares more about the income stream than about quarterly mark-to-market — the structural appeal is a fifty-plus-year hiker available at a yield that historically sat ten to one hundred fifty basis points lower.

The trade-off is the path of the share price itself. KMB stock has underperformed the broad market and the consumer-staples sector over recent five-year windows. The reasons are structural and worth naming: pulp and freight input costs have run elevated, private-label tissue competition has limited pricing power on the value end of the portfolio, the diaper category has faced declining US birth rate pressure on absolute volume, and the announced 2024 restructuring has introduced uncertainty about the eventual corporate structure. The dividend has continued growing through all of this, but the market has repriced the multiple downward — which is what shows up in the calculator's measured five-year share-price growth figure. Holders should understand that "current yield is elevated for the category" and "share price has been weak" are two sides of the same arithmetic, not independent facts.

In taxable accounts, KMB's dividends are qualified for the long-term capital-gains rate, given the standard sixty-day holding-period rule (the share must be held for more than sixty days during the 121-day window centered on the ex-date). Most buy-and-hold investors clear this threshold easily. In tax-advantaged accounts — IRAs, Roth IRAs, 401(k)s — the qualified-dividend treatment is moot because no current-year tax applies; the structural advantage of a long-running dividend grower is the compounding of share count via DRIP without tax friction.

Compared to dividend-focused ETFs like SCHD, KMB offers concentrated exposure to a single mature consumer-staples business rather than a diversified basket. A KMB investor accepts company-specific risk — including input-cost exposure to pulp markets, US private-label tissue competition, demographic pressure on the diaper category, currency translation effects on the roughly fifty percent of revenue generated outside the US dollar zone, and execution risk around the announced restructuring. SCHD, by contrast, holds roughly one hundred names with a single-stock cap; it sacrifices some yield to eliminate the concentration risk. Many income-focused investors hold both: KMB for the long-streak Aristocrat signal and the elevated entry yield, SCHD for the diversification.

KMB is generally considered a defensive holding because demand for diapers, tissue, and feminine-care products tends to be relatively insensitive to the economic cycle — these are recurring household purchases rather than discretionary spending. The defensive character is real, but the price action over the recent five-year window is a reminder that defensive demand does not guarantee defensive share-price behavior when the input-cost and competitive structure of the underlying business is under pressure. As with any single-stock position, this content is educational only; it is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold KMB, and individual circumstances vary.

Hypothetical scenarios

Scenario 1: KMB vs PG vs CL — three Dividend Aristocrats side by side

Consider an income-focused investor evaluating three large-cap US consumer-staples Aristocrats: Kimberly-Clark (KMB), Procter & Gamble (PG), and Colgate-Palmolive (CL). All three have streaks of fifty-plus consecutive years of annual dividend increases, all three are members of the Dividend Aristocrats and Kings cohort, all three carry investment-grade credit ratings, and all three derive roughly half or more of revenue from outside the United States. On the surface they look interchangeable as income holdings. The structural differences matter.

KMB carries a streak of more than fifty years, a market capitalization in the $40-45 billion range, a revenue mix split across personal care, consumer tissue, and the K-C Professional commercial-tissue business, and a geographic mix of roughly fifty percent US and fifty percent international. The current forward yield sits at the high end of the Aristocrat cohort, driven primarily by share-price compression rather than by accelerated dividend growth. The five-year dividend growth rate has been in the low-single-digit range as input-cost pressure compressed margins.

PG carries a streak of more than sixty-seven years — the longest of the three by a meaningful margin — a market capitalization roughly ten times KMB's at around $400 billion, and a much broader portfolio spanning beauty, health care, grooming, home care, fabric care, and baby and feminine care. The category breadth gives PG more pricing-power optionality across the portfolio: when one category faces input-cost or competitive pressure, the rest of the portfolio can typically absorb. The yield is meaningfully lower than KMB's, the share price has been steadier through the recent five-year window, and the dividend growth pace has been steadier as well. PG is the lower-yield, lower-volatility option in the comparison.

CL carries a streak of more than sixty years, a market capitalization around $75 billion, and a category focus on oral care (the Colgate toothpaste franchise) plus personal care, home care, and a smaller pet-nutrition business under Hill's. The geographic mix is the most international of the three at roughly seventy-five percent outside the US, which means slower contribution from US growth offset by higher emerging-markets exposure. The dividend growth pace has been slow over the recent window, the yield sits between PG's and KMB's, and the gross margin profile is the strongest of the three because oral care carries premium pricing power.

The structural trade-off is straightforward when laid out. KMB offers the highest current yield among the three Aristocrats but the weakest recent five-year price action and the most concentrated input-cost exposure. PG offers the steadiest fundamentals — the broadest portfolio, the longest streak, the most stable price — at the cost of the lowest yield. CL offers the most international diversification and the strongest margin profile, with the slowest US growth contribution and a dividend growth pace that has been similar to KMB's. None of these is the "right" answer; each fits a different investor preference. A yield-prioritizing Aristocrat investor leans toward KMB. A stability-prioritizing Aristocrat investor leans toward PG. An international-diversification-prioritizing investor leans toward CL. Many portfolios hold all three for the combined exposure across the consumer-staples sector.

The structural takeaway is that "Dividend Aristocrat" is not a single risk-return profile — within the cohort, current yield and price-action history can diverge meaningfully depending on the underlying business mix and the recent input-cost environment.

Scenario 2: KMB's elevated yield — opportunity or warning?

The current KMB yield is roughly twice what it was five years ago. The arithmetic source of that doubling is not dividend acceleration. The dividend has grown at a low-single-digit annual pace over that window — perhaps fifteen to twenty percent cumulative over five years. To double the yield while the dividend grew only fifteen to twenty percent, the price denominator has to have compressed substantially. That is what has happened. KMB's share price has declined over the trailing five-year window, while the dividend has continued growing at the modest Aristocrat pace, and the yield ratio has risen mechanically as a result.

For a Path A income-focused investor evaluating KMB at today's elevated yield, the same data supports two structurally different interpretations.

The opportunity reading: KMB is a high-quality fifty-plus-year hiker available at a depressed price relative to its own history. The dividend track record is intact, the business is generating sustainable operating cash flow that covers the payout ratio at fifty-five to seventy percent of earnings, and the input-cost pressure that compressed margins through 2022-2024 will eventually normalize as pulp prices and freight costs revert toward longer-term averages. A reversion of the price-to-earnings multiple back toward KMB's own historical norm, combined with continued low-single-digit dividend hikes, could deliver attractive total return from today's entry point. Yield-on-cost compounds favorably when the entry yield is high.

The warning reading: the market is pricing in real structural challenges that the historical dividend streak does not capture. Pulp and packaging input costs may stay elevated for longer than mean-reversion models suggest. Private-label tissue competition continues to limit pricing power on the value end of the portfolio. The US birth rate decline is a multi-year demographic headwind for the diaper category, which contributes a meaningful share of personal-care revenue. The announced 2024 restructuring introduces uncertainty about the eventual corporate structure under which dividends will be paid, and how that structure handles the consolidated dividend has not been fully disclosed. The streak record is informative but not deterministic — Leggett & Platt's fifty-two-year streak broke in 2024 in a similar margin-pressured downturn, and 3M's streak broke in connection with the Solventum spin. The market may be reading the combination of margin pressure, competitive pressure, and restructuring uncertainty as a structural deterioration rather than a cyclical dip.

Neither reading is obviously correct. Both are consistent with the observed data. What matters for the calculator output is recognizing that the projection assumes two separate inputs that are currently in tension. The dividend-growth input continues to project income at the trailing five-year hike pace. The price-growth input — the measured share-price growth fallback used when the user does not override it — currently reflects the recent decline, which means a negative number. If the negative price-growth pattern continues, the calculator's portfolio-value line will look depressed even as the annual-dividend line continues to climb.

That decoupling is the central thing to understand. For a cash-flow-focused investor — one whose primary use of the position is the quarterly dividend stream — the income line is the relevant projection, and a continued slow-but-steady hike pace at the Aristocrat cadence delivers the expected outcome regardless of where the share price sits. For a total-return-focused investor — one who cares about the combined picture of income plus capital appreciation — the price line matters too, and a continued negative price-growth pattern means the position is producing income but losing portfolio value at the same time. They are two different investor profiles reading the same calculator output through two different lenses.

The honest framing for an elevated yield from a long-streak Aristocrat: the income stream is what the streak record actually supports. The capital appreciation is what the market is currently disputing. Whether the current price represents an opportunity or a warning depends on whether you trust the streak record or the market repricing as the more accurate signal about the next decade. Reasonable investors weigh those two signals differently, and the calculator does not — and cannot — adjudicate between them.

These scenarios assume the historical pattern of dividend growth continues at a similar pace. Real outcomes depend on KMB's future capital allocation, the eventual structure of the announced restructuring, the path of pulp and freight input costs, tax treatment in your specific account, and the broader path of US equity markets. Educational only; not a forecast.

Compare KMB with another ticker

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-30.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.