MSFT logo

MSFT Dividend Calculator

$450.240.81% fwd yield12.75% 5-yr SPGclose 2026-05-29 · Polygon.io

Real-time refresh paused — values may lag.

Dividend growth rate (CAGR)

1Y: 10.39%2Y: 10.39%5Y: 10.22%10Y: 10.18%All: 11.46%
YearStart BalanceStart SharesShare PriceDividend / ShareDividend YieldYield on CostAnnual DividendTotal DividendsEnd SharesEnd Balance
1$10,00022.21$507.65$3.650.72%0.74%$91.31$91.3127.40$13,908
2$13,90827.40$572.37$4.020.70%0.81%$120.29$211.6032.05$18,344
3$18,34432.05$645.35$4.430.69%0.88%$152.01$363.6136.23$23,379
4$23,37936.23$727.63$4.880.67%0.95%$186.79$550.4039.98$29,092
5$29,09239.98$820.40$5.380.66%1.02%$224.97$775.3743.36$35,574
6$35,57443.36$925.00$5.930.64%1.09%$266.90$1,04246.41$42,926
7$42,92646.41$1,043$6.540.63%1.17%$312.99$1,35549.15$51,263
8$51,26349.15$1,176$7.210.61%1.25%$363.71$1,71951.63$60,717
9$60,71751.63$1,326$7.940.60%1.33%$419.55$2,13953.88$71,435
10$71,43553.88$1,495$8.760.59%1.41%$481.05$2,62055.91$83,583
These numbers assume your starting yield, dividend growth rate, and share-price growth all hold for 10 years straight. Real markets don't work that way — companies cut dividends, ETFs change strategy, prices swing in ways the inputs above can't capture. Use this projection to compare scenarios (more contribution vs less, DRIP on vs off, 10 years vs 25), not as a number you'll see in your brokerage account.
DRIP gained you+$1,676 over 10 years
Loading projection chart…

S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.

Historical dividends per share

Loading dividend history chart…

Price-led pattern. MSFT's 5-year share-price CAGR is 12.75%/yr, well above its 0.79% dividend yield. The bulk of return here is capital appreciation; dividends are a side-effect, not the story.

Yield-on-cost stays low even after years of holding. Reinvested dividends compound slowly relative to price growth.

Based on dividends paid August 2011 to May 2026.

Recent dividends

Ex-dateCash amountTTM yieldFwd yieldShare price
2026-05-21$0.910.85%0.87%$419.09
2026-02-19$0.910.87%0.91%$398.46
2025-11-20$0.910.71%0.76%$478.43
2025-08-21$0.830.66%0.66%$504.24
2025-05-15$0.830.72%0.73%$453.13
2025-02-20$0.830.76%0.80%$416.13
2024-11-21$0.830.75%0.80%$412.87
2024-08-15$0.750.71%0.71%$421.03
2024-05-15$0.750.69%0.71%$423.08
2024-02-14$0.750.70%0.73%$409.49
2023-11-15$0.750.75%0.81%$369.67
2023-08-16$0.680.85%0.85%$320.40

Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.

About MSFT

Microsoft Corporation — ticker MSFT — is the world's largest or second-largest company by market capitalization in any given quarter, alternating that position with Apple and more recently Nvidia. The business spans personal computing (Windows, Surface, the Xbox gaming franchise plus the 2023 $69 billion Activision Blizzard acquisition), productivity and business processes (the Microsoft 365 and Office franchise, Dynamics, LinkedIn), and intelligent cloud (Azure, the server and tools businesses, GitHub). Azure is the central growth engine and the second-largest public cloud platform behind AWS; the productivity franchise is the high-margin annuity that underwrites the rest of the capital plan. Microsoft's investment in OpenAI — including the exclusive Azure compute partnership and the integration of frontier models into Copilot across the product surface — anchors the company's position in the generative AI era.

MSFT did not always pay a dividend. Through the long Bill Gates era the company hoarded cash on the balance sheet, ultimately accumulating one of the largest corporate cash piles in history. The regular quarterly dividend was reinstated in the first quarter of 2003 under CEO Steve Ballmer as part of a deliberate capital-return push, and was followed in 2004 by a one-time special distribution of $3 per share that returned roughly $32 billion of accumulated cash to shareholders in a single payment. From that point forward the dividend has been raised every year. Under Satya Nadella, CEO since 2014, the per-share hike has run with remarkable consistency at roughly 10% per year — high single digits in some years, low double digits in others — placing MSFT in a distinctive zone of the dividend-payer universe: a multi-decade growth runway with one of the highest-quality dividend growth profiles of any large-cap stock.

The headline yield is low, structurally. MSFT trades at a growth-stock multiple, so even when the per-share dividend climbs at a ~10% clip the yield on the current price typically sits below 1%. This is not a current-income holding; it is a dividend-growth holding where the math works through compounding rather than starting payout.

The AI capex era, starting in 2024, is the central tension in any forward view of MSFT's dividend. Microsoft is investing capital expenditure at a historic share of revenue — building out Azure data centers, GPU clusters, custom silicon, and the power and cooling infrastructure required to run frontier model training and inference at scale. The relevant question for an income-focused holder is whether this capex spike compresses the dividend growth rate. The cushion is the free cash flow base itself: MSFT generates one of the largest FCF streams in the corporate world, and the dividend currently consumes only a fraction of it. Roughly 25-30% of FCF flows to dividends, 50-60% to buybacks, and the residual goes to M&A, R&D, and balance-sheet cash. As long as the FCF base continues to grow with Azure and Copilot revenue, the dividend can keep climbing at the historical cadence even with elevated capex absorbing a larger share of operating cash flow. The bear case is that AI ROI disappoints relative to the capex level and FCF growth slows; in that scenario the dividend would still be paid and likely grown, but at a slower per-year rate.

Expense ratio is not applicable to individual stocks — the figure in the calculator above is zero, since there is no fund wrapper between you and the underlying shares.

How MSFT pays dividends

MSFT pays cash dividends quarterly, on an approximately March–June–September–December cadence. The board declares the per-share amount roughly six weeks before each pay date; the ex-dividend date typically falls in the second or third week of the second month of the quarter, and the pay date follows about three weeks after the ex-date. Holders of record at the close on the day before the ex-date receive the distribution; the share price drops on the open of the ex-date by approximately the per-share amount.

The once-per-year hike pattern is the operationally distinctive feature. MSFT announces the new dividend rate in September each year — typically in the same press release as the annual shareholder meeting calendar and the next round of buyback authorization. The new rate takes effect on the December payment, the first quarterly distribution after the September announcement. This means the calendar year of a hike is split: the March, June, and September payments use the prior year's rate, and only the December payment reflects the new rate. The year-over-year dividend growth rate the calculator uses smooths this into an annualized figure.

The dividend-versus-buyback split is the central feature of Microsoft's capital-return policy and worth understanding if you're projecting income forward. The board has consistently funded both channels in parallel rather than substituting one for the other. Dividends absorb roughly 25-30% of FCF, buybacks absorb 50-60%, and the residual builds balance-sheet cash or funds tuck-in acquisitions. The dividend channel is the structural commitment — it grows every year and is rarely cut at a company of MSFT's scale absent a generational crisis — while the buyback channel is the flex variable. In a heavy capex year the board can throttle the buyback pace to fund the data center build, while still raising the dividend on schedule. This is why the AI capex spike is unlikely to interrupt the dividend even if it pressures the buyback line.

The enormous absolute size of Microsoft's free cash flow is what makes the dual-channel policy work. The total annual dividend outlay is a manageable fraction of operating cash flow, leaving meaningful room for R&D, capex, and M&A on top of the buyback. The Activision Blizzard acquisition in 2023 was funded primarily from cash on hand and modest debt issuance without any disruption to the dividend cadence; the AI capex acceleration is being funded the same way, out of operating cash flow rather than at the expense of capital return.

DRIP through Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard, IBKR, or Robinhood works the same way it does for any quarterly US dividend stock — the cash distribution buys additional shares at the prevailing price on or near the pay date, with fractional-share reinvestment supported. MSFT dividends are qualified for the long-term capital-gains rate in taxable accounts assuming the standard sixty-day holding-period rule is met. There is no managed-distribution policy, no return of capital, and no options overlay; the dividend is funded out of free cash flow.

Who MSFT suits

MSFT suits the growth-tilted income investor — the holder who accepts a low headline yield in exchange for what is arguably the highest-quality dividend growth rate available among large-cap dividend payers. The yield typically sits below 1%, well underneath any income-screening threshold a current-income investor would set. The structural argument for owning MSFT in a dividend portfolio is not the year-one income — it is the trajectory.

The DRIP-on-low-yield-high-DGR math is counterintuitive for investors trained on yield-first thinking. Reinvested distributions buy only a small share count each quarter because the cash amount is small relative to the share price. The compounding does not come primarily from share-count growth via DRIP; it comes from per-share dividend growth at ~10% per year and from share-price appreciation that reflects continued earnings growth. After fifteen or twenty years the per-share dividend has multiplied several times, and the position's yield-on-cost — the annual income divided by the original purchase price — rises into a range that competes with or exceeds what a high-yield-low-DGR holding would have produced over the same window. A reader who purchased MSFT in 2010 and held through to today is collecting yield-on-cost well above 6% on the original cost basis, even though the current-price yield is still below 1%.

The trade-off versus a high-yield-low-DGR holding like AT&T or Verizon is direct. Telecom names offer headline yields in the 5-7% range with mid-single-digit or flat dividend growth and meaningful cut risk in stress scenarios. MSFT offers a starting yield below 1% with ~10% annual growth and one of the most robust FCF profiles in the equity market. Over a twenty-year window, MSFT's cumulative income stream — and especially the year-twenty income — typically exceeds what a higher-yield-lower-growth name produces, because compound growth at 10% dominates linear yield over multi-decade windows. Over a three-year window, the high-yield name wins on income; the inversion happens somewhere around year ten to fifteen depending on assumptions.

MSFT is therefore not a fit for current-income retirees who need the portfolio to fund living expenses today. It is a structural fit for accumulators who are ten to twenty-five years away from drawdown — investors who are still in the contribution phase of their financial life, who care about the income line at the start of retirement rather than this year, and who are willing to accept a low headline yield in exchange for the highest-quality growth path available in the dividend-payer universe. As with any single-stock position, this content is educational only; it is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold MSFT, and individual circumstances vary.

Hypothetical scenarios

Scenario 1: $25,000 in MSFT held for 20 years with DRIP

Consider a hypothetical purchase of $25,000 of Microsoft stock today, held for 20 years with all quarterly dividends reinvested through DRIP. The starting yield is below 1%, which means the first-year dividend income is modest in absolute dollar terms — the kind of figure that, on its own, would lead a yield-first investor to dismiss the position. The structural argument is in the trajectory, not the starting point. With the calculator's default dividend growth rate of roughly 10% per year — the cadence MSFT has held under Satya Nadella since 2014 — the per-share dividend amount roughly doubles every seven years. Over a 20-year horizon the per-share dividend multiplies several times over, even if the share price never moves.

Three forces compound against the same initial position. First, the per-share dividend grows at the assumed annual rate; this is the dominant driver in a low-yield-high-DGR position. Second, DRIP adds a small number of shares each quarter at the prevailing price; the share-count contribution is meaningfully smaller than in a higher-yield position because each distribution buys fewer shares, but it still compounds. Third, the share price tends to track the long-run earnings trajectory, and Microsoft's earnings have grown alongside Azure and the Copilot franchise. The combined effect by year 20 is that the annual income line is many multiples of the year-one figure, and the position's yield-on-cost has climbed from below 1% into the mid-single-digit range or higher if the historical DGR is sustained.

The comparison to KO held for the same 20 years is the illustrative one. KO starts with a yield in the low-to-mid single digits and grows the per-share dividend at mid-single-digit rates; MSFT starts below 1% and grows at roughly 10%. In years one through ten the KO position produces meaningfully more cumulative cash income. Somewhere around year fifteen to twenty, depending on the exact growth-rate assumptions, MSFT's per-share dividend on the original cost basis catches up to KO's, and from that point forward MSFT's income line pulls ahead. The structural reason is mathematical: compound growth at 10% dominates compound growth at 5% over long horizons. The KO investor has been collecting more income along the way; the MSFT investor ends the period with a higher annual income stream. Neither outcome is universally better — the choice depends on whether the holder values income now versus income in the second half of the holding period.

Scenario 2: AI capex era and dividend growth durability

The single biggest variable affecting MSFT's long-term dividend projection is whether the ~10% annual hike rate of the Nadella era survives the AI capex spike. The bull case and the bear case are both worth modeling explicitly in the calculator, because they produce materially different year-20 income outcomes.

The bull case is straightforward. Microsoft's free cash flow is enormous, and the dividend currently consumes only 25-30% of it. Azure revenue continues to grow at a healthy pace as enterprise AI workloads migrate onto Microsoft's infrastructure; Copilot monetization across Microsoft 365, GitHub, and Dynamics adds new high-margin revenue layers on top of the existing Office annuity. Even with capex running at a historic share of revenue, the FCF base grows fast enough to absorb both the elevated investment and the continued ~10% dividend hike. In this scenario the calculator's default growth rate is reasonable and the year-20 income projection is achievable. To model this case, leave the dividend growth rate field at its default trailing-five-year value.

The bear case is that AI ROI disappoints relative to the capex level. The data center build is funded out of operating cash flow, and if the incremental revenue from those data centers does not scale at the rate the build implies, FCF growth slows or temporarily flattens. The board does not cut the dividend in this scenario — Microsoft is too large and too cash-rich for that — but the annual hike rate may step down into the 6-8% range while the capex cycle works through. To model this case in the calculator, override the dividend growth rate field with a value in the 6-8% range. The year-20 income projection drops meaningfully; this is the math working as it should, since compound growth is sensitive to the rate over long horizons.

A balanced approach is to run both scenarios — the default ~10% case and an explicit ~7% bear case — and treat the realized outcome as likely falling somewhere between them. The single dial that matters most is the dividend growth rate field. Starting yield is fixed and small; price growth is uncertain but secondary; the DGR assumption drives the long-run income line. The calculator on this page is designed to make that override a single input change, so the bull-bear comparison can be done in a few seconds. Educational only; not a forecast.

Compare MSFT with another ticker

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-30.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.