PEP Dividend Calculator
Dividend growth rate (CAGR)
| Year | Yield | Div / share | Annual income | Yield on cost | Cumulative income | Portfolio value | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9% | $5.75 | $387.00 | 3.1% | $387.00 | $12,826 | 85.98 |
| 2 | 4.1% | $6.17 | $530.59 | 3.6% | $917.59 | $15,805 | 105.59 |
| 3 | 4.4% | $6.62 | $698.92 | 4.1% | $1,617 | $18,963 | 126.26 |
| 4 | 4.7% | $7.10 | $896.41 | 4.6% | $2,513 | $22,329 | 148.17 |
| 5 | 5.0% | $7.62 | $1,128 | 5.1% | $3,641 | $25,940 | 171.54 |
| 6 | 5.4% | $8.17 | $1,401 | 5.7% | $5,042 | $29,835 | 196.64 |
| 7 | 5.8% | $8.76 | $1,723 | 6.4% | $6,765 | $34,067 | 223.76 |
| 8 | 6.2% | $9.40 | $2,103 | 7.2% | $8,868 | $38,693 | 253.29 |
| 9 | 6.6% | $10.08 | $2,553 | 8.1% | $11,421 | $43,786 | 285.66 |
| 10 | 7.0% | $10.81 | $3,088 | 9.1% | $14,509 | $49,432 | 321.40 |
Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)
Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.
Historical dividends per share
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Cash amount | TTM yield | Fwd yield | Share price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | $1.48 | 4.8% | 4.0% | $148.67 |
| 2026-03-06 | $1.42 | 4.4% | 3.6% | $159.43 |
| 2025-12-05 | $1.42 | 4.8% | 3.9% | $145.02 |
| 2025-09-05 | $1.42 | 4.7% | 3.9% | $146.39 |
| 2025-06-06 | $1.42 | 5.3% | 4.4% | $130.03 |
| 2025-03-07 | $1.36 | 3.5% | 3.5% | $154.44 |
| 2024-12-06 | $1.36 | 3.4% | 3.4% | $157.79 |
| 2024-09-06 | $1.36 | 3.0% | 3.1% | $177.34 |
| 2024-06-07 | $1.36 | 3.0% | 3.2% | $171.04 |
| 2024-02-29 | $1.27 | 3.8% | 3.1% | $165.34 |
| 2023-11-30 | $1.27 | 3.6% | 3.0% | $168.29 |
| 2023-08-31 | $1.27 | 3.4% | 2.8% | $177.92 |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of last 12 months of payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.
About PEP
PepsiCo, Inc. — ticker PEP — is one of the longest-running dividend payers in the US equity market and one of the small group of "Dividend Kings" with streaks of fifty years or longer. The company has raised its dividend in each of the last roughly fifty-plus years, with the streak running from 1973 onward. The streak has continued through every major US recession of the modern era and through multiple cycles of consumer-staples industry consolidation. That continuity is one of the central reasons PEP occupies a permanent place in many income-focused portfolios alongside KO and PG.
PepsiCo operates in the Consumer Defensive sector but is structured differently from the closest peer comparison, Coca-Cola. The most common framing of PEP is "beverages plus snacks," and the split between the two is not even close: by revenue, the snack business — primarily Frito-Lay in North America and adjacent brands internationally — is larger than the beverage business. Pepsi-branded carbonated drinks, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, and the broader beverage portfolio are major franchises, but the Frito-Lay portfolio (Lay's, Doritos, Cheetos, Ruffles, Tostitos, and others) is the larger revenue and profit contributor. The Quaker Foods portfolio adds an oatmeal and breakfast-foods component, smaller in revenue terms but contributing brand reach.
This snack-heavy mix is a structural feature worth keeping in mind when comparing PEP to KO. The snack category has historically grown faster than carbonated beverages over multi-decade windows, partly because per-capita consumption has trended up rather than facing the same sugar-consumption headwinds that have constrained soda volumes in some developed markets. The result is that PEP's underlying revenue growth has been a touch faster than KO's over long windows, even though both names occupy the same "mature consumer-defensive Dividend King" bracket in dividend-investing taxonomies.
The dividend mandate has been built into the company's capital-allocation policy for so long that it functions as a structural commitment. Management has consistently prioritized maintaining and growing the dividend alongside reinvestment in the brand portfolio, with share repurchases as the secondary capital-return lever. The credit-rating profile sits in the upper investment-grade range; the balance sheet carries debt but is well supported by the recurring snack and beverage cash flow. Expense ratio is not applicable to individual stocks — the figure you'll see in the calculator above is zero, since there is no fund wrapper between you and the underlying shares.
The dividend has never been cut in modern history. It has occasionally grown more slowly than longer-term averages in particular years, but the per-share amount has never been reduced or suspended — which is the relevant test for a Dividend King.
How PEP pays dividends
PEP pays cash dividends quarterly, on a January–March–June–September cadence (the exact months vary slightly year over year, but the cadence is four payments per year on a roughly equal spacing). The board declares the per-share amount each quarter; the ex-dividend date typically falls in the first or second week of the month preceding the pay month, and the pay date falls in the first or second week of the relevant month. Holders who own shares as of the close on the day before the ex-date receive the dividend; holders who buy on or after the ex-date wait for the next quarterly payment. On the ex-date the share price drops by approximately the distribution amount on the open, reflecting the fact that the company has paid the cash out of its balance sheet.
Holders who DRIP through their broker receive additional shares purchased at the prevailing market price around the pay date. Most major brokers offer fractional-share DRIP for PEP, so the full cash distribution is reinvested even when the per-share amount divided by the share price doesn't produce a whole number. The mechanics are identical to any other quarterly US dividend stock — there is no managed-distribution policy, no covered-call overlay, and no return of capital. The cash that funds the dividend comes from operating free cash flow generated by snack and beverage sales worldwide.
Recent growth pattern: PEP has typically raised the quarterly per-share amount once per year, with the new rate taking effect on the first dividend payment following the announcement (usually announced in early-year for a mid-year start). The size of the annual hike has historically run in the mid-to-high single digits — somewhat faster than KO's typical mid-single-digit raise, consistent with the snack-business contribution to the overall growth rate. The pattern of one cleanly compounded increase per year is the same as for most US large-cap dividend growers.
Because the increase happens once per year rather than spread over four quarters, the year-over-year dividend growth rate compounds cleanly. The calculator on this page uses a recent dividend growth rate to project the income line forward; you can override this with a custom growth rate if you want to model a more conservative or more optimistic path.
PEP's dividends are qualified for the long-term capital-gains rate in taxable accounts, given the standard sixty-day holding-period rule (the share must be held for more than sixty days during the 121-day window centered on the ex-date). Most buy-and-hold investors clear this threshold easily. In tax-advantaged accounts the qualified-dividend treatment is moot because no current-year tax applies; the structural advantage of a long-running dividend grower in a Roth IRA or 401(k) is the compounding of share count via DRIP without tax friction.
Who PEP suits
PEP suits investors who want a long-streak consumer-defensive dividend grower with a slightly higher current yield and slightly faster underlying revenue growth than the closest peer, Coca-Cola. The yield typically sits in the mid single digits — comfortably above the broader S&P 500 average and structurally higher than KO's yield in most periods, though both sit in similar territory. The trade-off is the canonical Dividend King one: a lower headline yield than high-yield stocks like AT&T or Verizon in exchange for a much higher confidence that the income will continue and grow over multi-decade windows.
The most useful peer comparison for PEP is against Coca-Cola. Both are Dividend Kings with streaks longer than fifty years, both pay quarterly, both are qualified-dividend-eligible in taxable accounts, and both operate in the global consumer-defensive sector. The differences are structural rather than category-defining: PEP's snack business gives it slightly faster underlying revenue growth and a slightly higher current yield in most periods, while KO's pure-beverage focus and even longer streak give it a touch more of a "fixed-income substitute" character. Many income-oriented investors hold both, treating the pair as complementary rather than substitutes. A different comparison worth considering is PEP versus a diversified consumer-staples ETF such as XLP or a broader dividend ETF such as SCHD, which spreads exposure across the sector or across many dividend payers and removes the single-name concentration risk that comes with holding PEP directly.
In taxable accounts, PEP's dividends are qualified for the long-term capital-gains rate. This treatment is meaningful for a stock yielding in the mid single digits because the dollar amount of tax saved is proportional to the dividend received. In tax-advantaged accounts the treatment is moot. As with any single-stock position, this content is educational only; it is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold PEP, and individual circumstances vary.
PEP is generally considered a defensive holding because both snack and beverage demand tend to be relatively insensitive to the economic cycle — consumer staples in this category sell broadly through recessions as well as expansions. The defensive character is one of the structural reasons PEP appears in many income-oriented portfolios designed to be held through cycles.
Hypothetical scenarios
Scenario 1: $10,000 invested in PepsiCo at the start of 2000
Consider a hypothetical purchase of $10,000 of PepsiCo stock at the start of 2000. At that point the dividend streak was already more than a quarter century long, and the company was a globally distributed snack-and-beverage business with deep brand portfolios in both categories. The 2000 entry price implied a per-share figure in the mid thirties on a split-adjusted basis, and the initial $10,000 would have purchased a few hundred shares.
Holding from 2000 through to the present, with quarterly dividends reinvested via DRIP, three forces compound together. First, the per-share dividend grew each year as the company continued the streak — over the multi-decade window, the per-share figure increased many times over, supported by steady volume growth in the Frito-Lay snack business and price-pack innovation in beverages. Second, the share count grew as DRIP reinvested every quarterly distribution at the prevailing market price; share count growth alone, independent of price, would have meaningfully increased the income line by the end of the period. Third, the share price climbed broadly in line with long-run US consumer-staples performance, with sector-specific drawdowns at various points but a clear long-run upward drift.
The illustrative outcome is not a precise dollar figure — actual returns depend on the exact reinvestment prices, dividend taxes paid along the way in a taxable account, and the specific entry and exit timing. The structural point is that all three forces — per-share dividend growth, share-count growth from DRIP, and long-run price growth — compounded against the same initial position for a multi-decade window, and the annual dividend income at the end of the period is an order of magnitude larger than the year-one income. The snack-business contribution gives PEP a slightly faster underlying compounding rate than a pure-beverage Dividend King like KO, though both fall in the same general bracket. PEP is offered as a structural illustration, not a forecast.
Scenario 2: $50,000 today plus $500/month for 20 years
Consider a hypothetical accumulation strategy in PepsiCo: $50,000 starting capital, plus $500 per month added on a regular cadence for 20 years. The calculator on this page can model this exactly — set Initial investment to $50,000, Extra contribution to $500, Contribution frequency to Monthly, time horizon to 20 years, and leave DRIP on.
The mechanics: each month, the new $500 buys additional shares at the current price, which adds to the share count and therefore to next quarter's dividend. Each quarter, the dividend received from all accumulated shares is reinvested, adding more shares at the prevailing price. Over 20 years this dual-track accumulation — DCA contributions plus dividend reinvestment — produces a position large enough that the annual dividend stream alone meets a meaningful portion of a typical income target, even before considering any potential price appreciation on the position. Because PEP's per-share dividend growth has historically run in the mid-to-high single digits, both the share-count side and the per-share side of compounding contribute materially to the income line over a 20-year window.
What's worth focusing on in the calculator is not the year-20 portfolio total but the annual dividend column in the projection table. The first few years are slow because the base of dividend-generating shares is small; by year ten the annual dividend has grown significantly above year one as both the per-share amount and the share count have climbed; by year twenty the income line has compounded substantially. That ramp is the structural argument for combining DCA with a long-streak dividend grower like PEP: the contribution side builds the share base while the dividend-growth side scales the income each of those shares produces. These scenarios assume the historical pattern of dividend growth continues at a similar rate. Real outcomes depend on PEP's future capital allocation, the path of US and international snack-and-beverage demand, tax treatment in your specific account, and the broader path of US equity markets. Educational only; not a forecast.
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-05-15.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.