PLTY Dividend Calculator
Dividend growth rate not yet measurable from available history.
Yield-based dividend model — distributions are computed as a % of current NAV. See methodology
Long-horizon projection caveat
This fund combines a very high starting yield (75.0%) with significant historical NAV erosion (-22.9% annualized). The 25-year projection assumes those mechanics persist for the full horizon. Funds of this type — single-name option-income, futures-roll income, ultra-high distribution rates — historically have much shorter useful lifespans, and the late-year numbers (share count, portfolio value) should be read as illustrative of the trajectory rather than a literal forecast.
| Year | Start Balance | Start Shares | Share Price | Dividend / Share | Dividend Yield | Yield on Cost | Annual Dividend | Total Dividends | End Shares | End Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10,000 | 299.85 | $25.71 | $19.28 | 75.00% | 71.71% | $8,892 | $8,892 | 693.73 | $17,836 |
| 2 | $17,836 | 693.73 | $19.82 | $14.86 | 75.00% | 102.50% | $15,171 | $24,062 | 1488.29 | $29,497 |
| 3 | $29,497 | 1488.29 | $15.28 | $11.46 | 75.00% | 142.53% | $24,515 | $48,578 | 3066.51 | $46,853 |
| 4 | $46,853 | 3066.51 | $11.78 | $8.83 | 75.00% | 196.03% | $38,423 | $87,000 | 6170.82 | $72,683 |
| 5 | $72,683 | 6170.82 | $9.08 | $6.81 | 75.00% | 268.73% | $59,121 | $146,121 | 12238.42 | $111,125 |
| 6 | $111,125 | 12238.42 | $7.00 | $5.25 | 75.00% | 368.55% | $89,925 | $236,046 | 24049.01 | $168,338 |
| 7 | $168,338 | 24049.01 | $5.40 | $4.05 | 75.00% | 506.61% | $135,771 | $371,817 | 46975.62 | $253,486 |
| 8 | $253,486 | 46975.62 | $4.16 | $3.12 | 75.00% | 698.64% | $204,002 | $575,819 | 91399.76 | $380,212 |
| 9 | $380,212 | 91399.76 | $3.21 | $2.41 | 75.00% | 966.93% | $305,549 | $881,368 | 177374.82 | $568,814 |
| 10 | $568,814 | 177374.82 | $2.47 | $1.85 | 75.00% | 1343.18% | $456,680 | $1,338,048 | 343629.74 | $849,507 |
| 11 | $849,507 | 343629.74 | $1.91 | $1.43 | 75.00% | 1872.54% | $681,605 | $2,019,652 | 664952.23 | $1,267,257 |
| 12 | $1,267,257 | 664952.23 | $1.47 | $1.10 | 75.00% | 2619.47% | $1,016,356 | $3,036,008 | 1285749.72 | $1,888,986 |
| 13 | $1,888,986 | 1285749.72 | $1.13 | $0.85 | 75.00% | 3676.11% | $1,514,559 | $4,550,567 | 2484842.90 | $2,814,293 |
| 14 | $2,814,293 | 2484842.90 | $0.87 | $0.65 | 75.00% | 5174.37% | $2,256,025 | $6,806,591 | 4800556.57 | $4,191,409 |
| 15 | $4,191,409 | 4800556.57 | $0.67 | $0.50 | 75.00% | 7303.33% | $3,359,533 | $10,166,124 | 9272219.71 | $6,240,943 |
| 16 | $6,240,943 | 9272219.71 | $0.52 | $0.39 | 75.00% | 10334.43% | $5,001,863 | $15,167,988 | 17906402.89 | $9,291,224 |
| 17 | $9,291,224 | 17906402.89 | $0.40 | $0.30 | 75.00% | 14657.70% | $7,446,110 | $22,614,098 | 34577029.12 | $13,830,895 |
| 18 | $13,830,895 | 34577029.12 | $0.31 | $0.23 | 75.00% | 20834.27% | $11,083,834 | $33,697,931 | 66763111.11 | $20,587,197 |
| 19 | $20,587,197 | 66763111.11 | $0.24 | $0.18 | 75.00% | 29672.27% | $16,497,785 | $50,195,716 | 128903590.42 | $30,642,467 |
| 20 | $30,642,467 | 128903590.42 | $0.18 | $0.14 | 75.00% | 42336.66% | $24,555,260 | $74,750,976 | 248874115.20 | $45,607,522 |
| 21 | $45,607,522 | 248874115.20 | $0.14 | $0.11 | 75.00% | 60508.34% | $36,547,039 | $111,298,016 | 480490956.09 | $67,879,716 |
| 22 | $67,879,716 | 480490956.09 | $0.11 | $0.08 | 75.00% | 86614.91% | $54,394,165 | $165,692,180 | 927650766.34 | $101,026,975 |
| 23 | $101,026,975 | 927650766.34 | $0.08 | $0.06 | 75.00% | 124165.16% | $80,955,684 | $246,647,864 | 1790934212.51 | $150,359,378 |
| 24 | $150,359,378 | 1790934212.51 | $0.06 | $0.05 | 75.00% | 178234.71% | $120,486,661 | $367,134,525 | 3457577790.94 | $223,779,807 |
| 25 | $223,779,807 | 3457577790.94 | $0.05 | $0.04 | 75.00% | 256171.18% | $179,319,823 | $546,454,348 | 6675171171.82 | $333,049,961 |
S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.
Explore alternative scenarios
- Model yield slowly normalizing → set
Annual dividend growthto-3%to-5% - Model NAV stabilization → set
Annual share price growthto0%or-10% - Compare against flat-distribution baseline → set both to
0%
Historical dividends per share
Distribution-decay pattern. PLTY's trailing 12-month distribution yield is 58.51% — roughly 18× SCHD's 3.27%. NAV has fallen at -22.91%/yr since inception. The two numbers describe the same machine: option-premium and return-of-capital distributions cycling out, NAV cycling down.
For monthly-cash-flow strategies, the headline is real but funded partly by the principal generating it. For buy-and-hold, the NAV trajectory is the dominant signal.
Based on dividends paid November 2024 to June 2026.
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Cash amount | TTM yield | Fwd yield | Share price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | $0.48 | — | 72.82% | $34.35 |
| 2026-05-28 | $0.37 | — | 54.55% | $35.01 |
| 2026-05-21 | $0.36 | — | 54.52% | $34.00 |
| 2026-05-14 | $0.44 | — | 67.45% | $33.62 |
| 2026-05-07 | $0.27 | — | 40.85% | $34.47 |
| 2026-04-30 | $0.36 | — | 53.71% | $34.92 |
| 2026-04-23 | $0.38 | — | 55.58% | $35.85 |
| 2026-04-16 | $0.36 | — | 50.98% | $36.27 |
| 2026-04-09 | $0.45 | — | 69.07% | $34.24 |
| 2026-04-02 | $0.45 | — | 60.44% | $38.69 |
| 2026-03-26 | $0.48 | — | 63.82% | $38.94 |
| 2026-03-19 | $0.80 | — | 101.84% | $40.94 |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.
About PLTY
PLTY — the YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF — is a synthetic covered-call income fund that uses short-dated options on Palantir Technologies (PLTR) to generate weekly distributions. Launched in November 2024, the fund does not hold PLTR shares directly. Instead, it holds a money-market base position and layers on a synthetic options structure: a long call at a lower strike combined with a short call at a higher strike, designed to replicate the payout profile of a covered-call position on PLTR without direct equity exposure. Distributions are funded by the net premium collected from selling the upper call. PLTR itself pays no corporate dividend — the company has consistently directed cash toward share repurchases and balance-sheet growth rather than recurring shareholder payments — so PLTY's distribution line is entirely a function of option premium, with zero contribution from underlying equity income.
Understanding "synthetic covered call" in plain terms: a traditional covered-call strategy holds shares and sells call options against them, collecting premium in exchange for capping upside. PLTY replicates this economically through options alone. The practical effect is the same — the fund collects option premium income each week and distributes it as cash, and in exchange the fund does not participate in strong PLTR rallies above the short-call strike. When PLTR makes a sharp move upward — and PLTR has historically delivered repeated 30-50% multi-month swings tied to AI-narrative cycles, S&P 500 index-inclusion flows, and government-contract headlines — the synthetic short-call position loses value at roughly the same rate the long position gains, capping the fund's net asset value. This is the primary structural risk: NAV erodes during large PLTR upswings, and PLTR has produced enough of those to drive PLTY's inception-to-date share-price growth to roughly -22.9%.
PLTR is among the more idiosyncratic large-cap equities in the US market. Its revenue mix spans US government, allied-government, and commercial enterprise customers, and its perceived fundamentals shift rapidly in response to AI infrastructure narrative cycles, defense budget headlines, and quarterly bookings volatility. PLTR joined the S&P 500 in late 2024 — roughly contemporaneous with PLTY's own launch — and the inclusion drove a substantial passive-flow rerating that continues to influence realized volatility. That volatility is, in a sense, the product PLTY is selling: higher underlying volatility produces richer option premiums, which produce larger distributions. The same mechanism that makes PLTR's realized volatility a source of income for PLTY also makes PLTY's distribution line volatile: when PLTR vol regime shifts, the premium available to harvest shifts with it. Investors should evaluate PLTY's headline forward yield of roughly 58.7% in that light, understanding that it compensates for a fundamentally different risk profile than a traditional dividend ETF.
Most of PLTY's distributions are classified as return of capital (ROC), not qualified dividends — the same tax structure as MSTY, NVDY, and the rest of YieldMax's single-stock lineup. ROC defers tax liability rather than eliminating it and reduces the holder's cost basis over time, which surfaces as capital gains when the position is eventually sold.
How PLTY pays distributions
PLTY distributes weekly. The ex-dividend date falls on Wednesday each week; the pay date follows two to three business days later, typically Friday. Because option premiums fluctuate with PLTR's implied volatility, the cash amount per share changes substantially from week to week. The three most recent distributions on file — $0.481, $0.3673, and $0.3565 — show meaningful variance even across consecutive weeks, with the high roughly 35% above the low across just three observations. Across the broader trailing window, the variance is wider still. Investors relying on PLTY for a regular income budget should plan around a conservative estimate rather than the average; weekly cadence makes the variance more visible week-to-week than a monthly fund, but the smoothed quarterly or annual figure can still mask the underlying choppiness.
PLTY was launched in November 2024 directly on a weekly distribution schedule, unlike the older YieldMax single-stock funds that started monthly and were later converted. As of the current snapshot the fund has 47 distributions on file, all weekly, with the first dated November 2024. This makes PLTY one of the cleaner case studies for evaluating the YieldMax weekly mechanic in isolation — there is no transition artifact in the distribution series.
Most of PLTY's distribution is classified as return of capital (ROC) rather than ordinary or qualified dividends. ROC treatment means the distribution is not taxed as income in the year received; instead, it reduces the shareholder's cost basis. A lower cost basis defers the tax liability until the shares are sold, at which point the gain is measured against the reduced basis and taxed at capital-gains rates. For investors in high marginal tax brackets, the ROC treatment tends to be more favorable than ordinary income — but it is not tax-free; it shifts the obligation forward rather than eliminating it. Holders who sell after a long holding period may face a larger capital-gains bill than the annual 1099 history suggested.
Tax-advantaged accounts sidestep the basis question entirely. In an IRA, Roth IRA, or 401(k), distributions reinvest without current tax consequences regardless of how they are classified. Holders who want to maximize the mechanical compounding of a high-yield option-income strategy often prefer to run it inside a tax-advantaged wrapper for exactly this reason, and the weekly cadence accelerates that compounding effect compared with monthly equivalents — fifty-two reinvestment events per year instead of twelve.
Forward yield in the seed data is approximately 58.7%. Yields at this level for equity-linked instruments reflect the monetization of elevated realized volatility — they are not a structural property of the underlying business. If PLTR's realized volatility normalizes toward historical averages for large-cap equities, the distribution line will contract mechanically. The fund's inception-to-date share-price decline of roughly 22.9% is direct evidence that the structural NAV-erosion mechanism is operating: the fund has paid out substantial income while the NAV has trended down, which is the expected outcome of a synthetic covered-call wrapper on a high-volatility, strongly trending name.
Who PLTY suits
PLTY suits a specific kind of income investor: one who has a high-conviction view on PLTR, is comfortable with volatile weekly cash flows, and wants to harvest option premium income from PLTR's sideways or modestly rising weeks rather than participate in PLTR's upside directly. The fund works best when PLTR is trading sideways to modestly higher — those are the conditions where the short-call position does not bleed NAV and premium income accrues unencumbered.
PLTY is explicitly not a buy-and-forget holding for stable income. In its short operating history since November 2024, NAV has trended downward in the same pattern as NVDY and MSTY: the synthetic short-call lid caps the fund's gains during the explosive single-name rallies that occur regularly in concentrated, high-conviction stocks, and PLTR has delivered several such rallies in PLTY's brief life. Each large PLTR upswing erodes a portion of the fund's NAV, and while distributions continue, the base on which those distributions are calculated shrinks over time. A high headline yield on a shrinking NAV can be misleading if the total-return picture — income plus or minus price change — is not tracked alongside the income line. The -22.9% inception SPG is the most direct evidence available for this dynamic in PLTY specifically.
Investors who want upside exposure to PLTR alongside the income stream sometimes pair PLTY with a direct PLTR position in a separate sleeve, letting the PLTY income partially offset the cost of holding the more volatile equity. Investors simply seeking reliable income without single-name concentration risk would be better served by broader covered-call ETFs such as JEPI or JEPQ, which diversify option exposure across large-cap equity baskets rather than concentrating it on a single name.
PLTY launched in November 2024, which means there is no meaningful long-term track record and no five-year dividend growth rate by definition. Any projection using a non-zero DGR is an assumption, not a historical extrapolation. Use the calculator above to model multiple scenarios, and review the scenarios page for guidance on base-case, flat, and shrinking-distribution assumptions. For comparable YieldMax single-stock structures with similar designs and caveats, see the MSTY calculator for the MSTR-based variant and the NVDY calculator for the NVDA-based variant — both have somewhat longer track records that can inform expectations for how PLTY's distribution and NAV behavior may evolve.
Hypothetical scenarios
Three projection scenarios
Because PLTY launched in November 2024 and has roughly eighteen months of distribution history, the calculator's default DGR is 0% — no positive measured growth window exists, and the inception share-price growth rate is approximately -22.9%. The base case below therefore overlaps the explicit 'Flat' case — both assume distributions stay roughly constant in nominal terms. The 'Shrinking' case explores the alternative where NAV erosion or vol compression progressively reduces per-share payouts. All scenarios use $10,000 as the starting investment, $200 monthly contributions, and DRIP enabled.
Base case: calculator default settings
PLTY uses the yield-based dividend model — distributions are computed as yield × NAV at each projection step. With the default DGR of 0%, the yield is maintained at its current level across the projection; with the measured inception share-price growth rate of -22.9%, the per-share dividend amount declines proportionally as NAV erodes. The base case therefore models the distributions you'd receive if the current yield-on-NAV ratio holds steady while NAV continues its observed decline trajectory. At the calculator's current forward yield of roughly 58.7%, the starting annual income on a $10,000 position scales linearly — see the projection table for precise figures. With DRIP enabled and $200 monthly contributions, the share count grows each week from reinvested distributions and each month from new capital.
At the 5-year mark, share-count compounding from DRIP and contributions produces a higher annual income run-rate than year one even with 0% DGR, and the weekly reinvestment cadence accelerates that effect compared with a monthly equivalent. At 10 years and 25 years, the compounding effect grows more pronounced — driven entirely by share accumulation, not distribution growth.
These numbers are mathematically correct given the inputs — but they should be treated with substantial skepticism for PLTY specifically. PLTY's option premium environment, PLTR's volatility regime, and the fund's NAV trajectory are all highly uncertain over multi-decade horizons, and the fund itself has less than two years of operating history. The base-case output (identical to the flat case) is most useful as a reference point to compare against the shrinking scenario below.
Flat distribution: ~59% yield, 0% DGR
The flat-distribution scenario assumes option premiums — and therefore per-share distributions — stay roughly constant in nominal terms over the projection period. No growth, no decline. The starting yield compounds purely through share-count accumulation under DRIP and ongoing $200 contributions.
Compared to the base case, this outcome produces a noticeably lower annual income at each time horizon because it removes the embedded NAV-decay assumption from the base case but also removes any productive premium growth. At 5 years the gap is visible; at 25 years the divergence is large. The flat scenario is the most natural planning assumption for an option-income fund with no dividend-growth history and a vol-dependent payout — it captures the compounding from reinvested distributions without embedding an optimistic premium-growth assumption. Investors who want a conservative floor for planning purposes should weight this scenario more heavily than the base case.
This scenario is also relevant for thinking about a vol-stabilization outcome: if PLTR's realized volatility settles into a lower, steadier regime after the current AI build-out and index-inclusion absorption period, option premiums available for harvest may compress, and the flat-distribution case approximates a world where per-share payouts plateau rather than grow. The flat scenario is arguably the most honest baseline for a fund without a growth mandate or dividend-growth history.
Shrinking distribution: ~59% yield, -3% DGR
The shrinking-distribution scenario applies a -3% annual decline in per-share payouts. This is especially relevant for option-income strategies tied to a single volatile underlying for two compounding reasons: first, NAV erosion during large PLTR upside moves reduces the asset base on which future premiums are earned — and PLTY's inception-to-date -22.9% share-price drop is direct evidence this mechanism has been active; second, PLTR's current high realized volatility may not persist — and if it normalizes toward broader market averages, the absolute premium available per share falls mechanically.
Compared to the base case, a -3% DGR scenario produces meaningfully lower income at every horizon — and compared to the flat case, the shortfall widens each year. At longer horizons, the shrinking-distribution case illustrates how NAV erosion can work against compounding even when DRIP is reinvesting every dollar. Investors who have observed PLTY's NAV trajectory since November 2024 and want to model a continuation of that trend should run this case alongside the base and flat cases.
Limits of these projections
The calculator provides a clean, smooth projection — but PLTY's actual behavior is neither clean nor smooth. Four structural limits are worth keeping in mind before relying on any long-horizon output.
Distribution variance is high and not modeled
PLTY's weekly distributions show meaningful week-to-week variance. The three most recent distributions on file — $0.481, $0.3673, and $0.3565 — span a range where the high is roughly 35% above the low across just three consecutive observations. Across the full 47-distribution history since November 2024, the swings are wider still. The calculator assumes a smooth annualized stream — the week-to-week swings are invisible in the projection table. Before relying on PLTY distributions as a regular income source, review the Recent dividends table on the calculator page to get a sense of actual variance. Weekly cadence makes the variance visible more often than a monthly fund, but the planning challenge is the same: budgeting around the average is likely to produce weeks of meaningful undershoot.
No five-year DGR exists for PLTY
PLTY launched in November 2024. The five-year DGR field in the computed data is null — not because the data is missing, but because the fund has not existed long enough to produce one. The calculator's default DGR for PLTY is 0% — no positive measured growth window exists across any time horizon. Users should treat long-horizon projections with extra caution. The flat case (0% DGR) and the shrinking case (-3% DGR) are the two most relevant scenarios for PLTY given its short history and the absence of any historical growth rate to extrapolate.
NAV erosion is not modeled
The most important structural risk for PLTY is NAV erosion, and the calculator does not model it. A 25-year projection assumes that the share count accumulated through DRIP retains its value — but PLTY's inception-to-date share-price growth is approximately -22.9%, and single-stock YieldMax products have exhibited the same declining-NAV pattern across their short histories as large underlying rallies erode the fund's net asset value through the synthetic short-call structure. In the real world, the same share count bought at a higher NAV is worth less as NAV falls. The calculator's compounding math is correct given its assumptions; the gap between those assumptions and PLTY's observed behavior is the main reason to use multiple scenarios and to monitor actual NAV alongside income.
After-tax modeling for ROC is not yet available
For taxable accounts, the calculator's after-tax projection treats distributions as ordinary income. PLTY's distributions are largely classified as return of capital, which is more tax-favorable — ROC reduces cost basis rather than generating current-year tax liability. This means the calculator's after-tax projection understates the actual after-tax yield for taxable holders. A full marginal-rate analysis should use the tax calculator with an awareness that most PLTY distributions will be reclassified at year-end. Tax-advantaged account holders can disregard this caveat entirely.
Compare PLTY with another ticker
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-06-09.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Looking for a specific ETF or stock?
Browse all 83 tickers — ETFs grouped by strategy, individual stocks grouped by yield.
Browse all tickers →