QYLD Dividend Calculator

Live data$18.1311.59% fwd yield-3.7% 5-yr SPGclose 2026-05-14 · Polygon.io

Dividend growth rate (CAGR)

1Y: -10.39%2Y: 5Y: 10Y: All: -10.39%
YearYieldDiv / shareAnnual incomeYield on costCumulative incomePortfolio valueShares
112.0%$2.10$1,1599.3%$1,159$13,118751.61
213.4%$2.25$1,69011.4%$2,849$16,641990.39
314.9%$2.41$2,38313.9%$5,231$20,7121280.43
416.5%$2.57$3,29616.8%$8,528$25,5271639.25
518.4%$2.75$4,51520.5%$13,043$31,3592091.74
620.4%$2.95$6,16525.3%$19,207$38,5912673.89
722.7%$3.15$8,43231.5%$27,639$47,7783438.67
825.2%$3.37$11,60339.7%$39,242$59,7324465.63
928.0%$3.61$16,12351.0%$55,364$75,6755876.70
1031.2%$3.86$22,70266.8%$78,067$97,4777863.13

Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)

Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.

Historical dividends per share

Recent dividends

Ex-dateCash amountTTM yieldFwd yieldShare price
2026-04-20$0.1812.6%12.1%$17.69
2026-03-23$0.1712.9%12.0%$17.20
2026-02-23$0.1812.7%12.2%$17.43
2026-01-20$0.1812.7%12.3%$17.48
2025-12-22$0.1813.5%12.1%$17.66
2025-11-24$0.1712.7%12.0%$17.33
2025-10-20$0.1713.9%12.0%$17.26
2025-09-22$0.1714.2%12.1%$16.95
2025-08-18$0.1714.4%12.1%$16.69
2025-07-21$0.1714.5%11.9%$16.66
2025-06-23$0.1714.7%12.0%$16.52
2025-05-19$0.1714.8%12.1%$16.31

Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of last 12 months of payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.

About QYLD

QYLD — the Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF — is a covered-call income fund issued by Global X (now part of Mirae Asset). Launched in December 2013, QYLD is the oldest and largest of the Global X index-covered-call lineup, which also includes XYLD (S&P 500), RYLD (Russell 2000), and DJIA (Dow). The fund holds the underlying Nasdaq-100 basket (effectively QQQ exposure) and writes at-the-money one-month index call options against the entire position each month, collecting the option premium and distributing it as monthly cash. The strategy is mechanical: roll a single at-the-money one-month call on the whole basket at the same point each cycle, collect the premium, distribute. There is no discretionary strike selection, no partial-write, and no active management of the option overlay beyond the standard monthly roll.

QYLD's mechanical at-the-money covered-call structure has two consequences that determine the fund's behavior in different market environments. First, the upside is capped at the strike (which is approximately the price of QQQ at the time the call is written). In months where the Nasdaq-100 rallies more than approximately the premium collected, the short-call leg loses value at roughly the same rate the underlying basket gains, the fund's net upside is approximately zero (the call writer captures the premium but the gains on the basket are surrendered through the short-call lid), and the NAV stagnates or rises only slightly. In months where the Nasdaq-100 is flat or modestly down, the call expires near or below the strike, the premium is fully retained, and the NAV captures most of the basket's small move plus the full premium. In months where the Nasdaq-100 declines more than the premium collected, the call expires worthless (premium fully retained) but the underlying basket loses more than the premium offsets, and the NAV declines net.

The structural consequence is NAV erosion risk in flat or bull markets. The covered-call writer captures only the premium during a strong rally — the upside above the strike is surrendered — while the holder of pure QQQ captures the full upside. Over a multi-year Nasdaq bull market, QYLD's NAV typically rises less than QQQ's, and the total return (NAV change plus distributions) typically trails QQQ's total return meaningfully. In flat or sideways markets, QYLD's NAV holds roughly steady and the distribution stream is the principal source of return. In bear markets, QYLD's NAV declines less than QQQ's (because the call premium partially cushions the decline), but it still declines, and the distribution stream typically also contracts as option premiums in low-volatility post-bear-market windows can be smaller. The fund's NAV has historically eroded gradually over multi-year horizons because the cumulative effect of capping upside during strong months is larger than the cumulative benefit of cushioning downside during weak months — Nasdaq-100 long-run drift is positive, and the covered-call strategy gives up most of that drift.

QYLD is a mechanical (not active) covered-call strategy. Compare to JEPI/JEPQ, which are more selective and managed. JEPI and JEPQ are actively managed covered-call funds — they hold a separately managed underlying equity basket (not the full index) and write covered calls through equity-linked notes with strike selection and notional sizing left to the portfolio manager. JEPI/JEPQ typically write below-the-money or partial-coverage call positions designed to retain more equity upside than a mechanical at-the-money strategy, at the cost of a lower headline yield. QYLD is the pure mechanical reference point — write at-the-money on the full basket every month, collect the maximum mechanical premium, distribute it, and accept the corresponding upside cap. The headline yield on QYLD typically runs above JEPI/JEPQ for that reason, and the NAV-erosion-in-bull-markets pattern is correspondingly more pronounced.

How QYLD pays distributions

QYLD distributes monthly. The ex-dividend date typically falls in the third week of each calendar month, and the pay date follows a few business days later. The per-share cash amount each month is the option premium collected from the at-the-money call written at the start of the cycle, capped at one percent of NAV in the fund's distribution policy (the cap is rarely binding because actual monthly premiums collected on at-the-money Nasdaq-100 calls typically run close to that range). The cash amount can vary modestly from month to month with the level of implied volatility on the Nasdaq-100 at the time the call is written — higher implied volatility produces a richer premium and a larger distribution; lower implied volatility produces a smaller distribution. Over a full year, the distributions average out to a high single-digit-to-low-double-digit yield on NAV depending on the volatility regime in the underlying Nasdaq-100 index.

QYLD's distributions have historically been classified largely as return of capital (ROC) for tax purposes. ROC reduces the shareholder's cost basis rather than producing current-year ordinary income; the tax liability is deferred until the shares are sold, at which point the gain is measured against the reduced basis and taxed at capital-gains rates. For investors in high marginal tax brackets, ROC treatment tends to be more favorable than ordinary income — but it is not tax-free, and holders who sell after a long holding period may face a larger capital-gains bill than the annual 1099 history suggested. The year-end 1099-DIV reports the exact split between ROC and ordinary income; the ROC share has varied across years depending on the fund's realized gains and losses inside the wrapper. Tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, Roth IRA, 401(k)) sidestep the basis question entirely — distributions reinvest without current tax consequences regardless of classification.

The expense ratio on QYLD is moderate among covered-call ETFs — higher than passive Nasdaq-100 exposure (QQQ or the Schwab-equivalent SCHG) but consistent with active or rules-based covered-call funds. The expense compounds against the holder over multi-decade horizons, and the impact on the realized income line is meaningful at the long end of a DCA-plus-DRIP framework.

Who QYLD suits

QYLD suits investors who want a high monthly headline yield from a covered-call strategy, accept the upside-cap and NAV-erosion trade-off, and prefer the simplicity and transparency of a mechanical at-the-money rule over an actively managed call-writing strategy. The fund works best in flat-to-modestly-rising Nasdaq-100 environments where the upside cap is rarely binding and the monthly premium accumulates as net income. It works least well during strong Nasdaq bull markets, where the upside surrender erodes total return relative to a pure-QQQ position; the distribution stream continues but the NAV trajectory diverges meaningfully from the underlying index.

QYLD does not fit the standard rising-dividend-stream profile. The per-share monthly distribution does not have a structural growth driver — it tracks the option-premium environment, which is sensitive to the implied volatility on the Nasdaq-100 at the start of each month, not to any underlying earnings or dividend-policy progression. Investors expecting a reliable rising income stream will find QYLD's profile different from quality-dividend ETFs (SCHD, VYM) that screen for consistent payout growth. The calculator on this page can model QYLD with a current forward yield and a chosen DGR, but the most defensible long-horizon planning approach uses the current yield with a zero or slightly negative DGR assumption, recognizing that historical NAV erosion has produced a downward trend in the dollar amount distributed per share even when the yield-on-NAV figure has remained stable.

For investors specifically seeking high-yield monthly income from a mechanical Nasdaq-100 covered-call strategy, QYLD is the canonical product. For investors who want a covered-call exposure with more retained upside, JEPQ (Nasdaq) or JEPI (S&P 500) are the actively managed alternatives, both with lower headline yields but historically better total-return preservation in bull-market windows. Investors who simply want broad Nasdaq exposure without the covered-call overlay should hold QQQ or QQQM directly and forgo the high-yield distribution stream entirely. The right choice among these alternatives depends on the holder's preference for income level versus total return, and on whether the holder is willing to accept the mechanical-overlay NAV-erosion pattern that QYLD has shown across its full operating history since 2013.

Hypothetical scenarios

Scenario 1: $50,000 in QYLD for monthly income with DRIP

Consider a hypothetical position of $50,000 in QYLD, held for monthly income with DRIP enabled. At a forward yield in the low double digits against the current per-share monthly rate, the starting annualized cash distribution on $50,000 is roughly $5,000 to $6,000, paid in twelve monthly installments. With DRIP on, the reinvested distributions purchase additional shares each month, and the share count compounds steadily — the monthly cadence produces twelve reinvestment events per year rather than the four available to a quarterly-paying fund, which marginally accelerates the share-count growth at the same yield.

This is the structural case QYLD is designed for. The mechanical at-the-money covered-call strategy on the Nasdaq-100 produces a high headline yield, paid monthly, with a high probability of distribution continuity month-over-month because the strategy is deterministic — write at-the-money, collect premium, distribute. The variation comes from changes in the level of implied volatility on the Nasdaq-100 at the time each monthly call is written, but the underlying mechanic produces a meaningful per-share distribution every month under normal market conditions.

The illustrative compounding picture across a five-year window depends critically on the path of the underlying Nasdaq-100 index. In a flat or modestly rising Nasdaq environment, the share count compounds steadily, the per-share distribution stays near its starting level, and the cumulative cash collected approaches the simple yield-times-time product. In a strong Nasdaq bull window, the share count still compounds (because the distributions continue), but the share price and NAV per share rise less than QQQ's, so the dollar value of the position lags a QQQ holder's cumulative total return. In a Nasdaq bear window, the share count compounds at lower reinvestment prices (which can be favorable for long-term compounding), but the absolute NAV of the position declines and the per-share distribution may also compress as option premiums in low-volatility post-bear-market windows can be smaller. The calculator on this page produces a deterministic projection at the input yield and DGR; the actual realized outcome depends on the Nasdaq-100 path.

The honest planning takeaway is that QYLD's monthly cash flow is the primary value the fund delivers, and the calculator output is a useful approximation of that cash flow over the holding window — provided the DGR is set conservatively (zero or slightly negative is more defensible than a positive single-digit assumption given the fund's history of NAV erosion in bull markets). Investors who would otherwise hold QQQ for total-return exposure should compare the QYLD-plus-distributions outcome against the QQQ-plus-no-distributions outcome over a multi-year window. Scenario 2 explores that comparison in more detail.

Scenario 2: QYLD versus QQQ — the total-return divergence over a Nasdaq bull window

Consider a hypothetical side-by-side comparison: $25,000 invested in QYLD and $25,000 invested in QQQ on the same date, both held with no contributions for five years, DRIP enabled on QYLD (because QYLD's monthly distributions need to compound somehow), DRIP enabled on QQQ as well (capturing QQQ's modest quarterly distributions). The two positions then experience the same underlying Nasdaq-100 price action over the five-year window, but the structural difference between holding pure QQQ and holding the covered-call wrapper produces materially different outcomes depending on the path.

In a strong Nasdaq bull window — say, an annualized fifteen-percent index return — QQQ captures the full upside through both price appreciation and modest quarterly dividends, and the $25,000 position grows to a substantially higher value through pure NAV compounding. QYLD captures the option premium every month and distributes it, the share count compounds via DRIP, but the NAV per share rises only modestly because the at-the-money short-call leg caps each month's upside near the strike. The five-year cumulative total return on the QYLD position — defined as final position value plus any cash taken (zero here, since DRIP is on) minus the starting position — typically trails the QQQ total return by a substantial margin. The headline yield on QYLD looked attractive at the start of the period, but the realized total return reveals the structural cost of the upside cap.

In a flat or modestly rising Nasdaq window — say, annualized two-to-five-percent index return — the two positions converge much more closely. QQQ captures the small upside and modest dividends; QYLD captures more option premium per share (because the strike is rarely binding) and DRIP compounds aggressively. The total return on QYLD may approach or exceed QQQ in this scenario because the option-premium stream becomes the dominant return source rather than NAV appreciation. This is the environment where QYLD's mechanical at-the-money structure delivers a favorable trade-off.

In a Nasdaq bear window, both positions decline in NAV; QYLD's decline is partially cushioned by the call premiums collected, so the bottom-of-drawdown NAV per share is somewhat higher than QQQ's, but neither position is doing well in absolute terms. The compounding through DRIP at lower reinvestment prices accelerates the share-count growth, which can favor long-term recovery on subsequent rallies.

The structural lesson is that QYLD trades upside participation for monthly income. In Nasdaq environments where the upside is large, that trade is unfavorable on a total-return basis; in environments where the upside is modest or sideways, the trade can be favorable. Investors choosing between QYLD and QQQ are choosing between an income-priority profile and a total-return-priority profile, not between two flavors of the same exposure. The calculator on this page models the income line for QYLD, but the total-return picture requires separately considering the NAV trajectory, which depends on the Nasdaq-100 path over the holding window. For investors who want covered-call income with more retained upside, the JEPI and JEPQ alternatives — both actively managed with selective strike choice — are designed to capture more of the equity upside at the cost of a lower headline yield. Educational only; not a forecast.

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-15.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.