SPMO Dividend Calculator
Dividend growth rate (CAGR)
| Year | Start Balance | Start Shares | Share Price | Dividend / Share | Dividend Yield | Yield on Cost | Annual Dividend | Total Dividends | End Shares | End Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10,000 | 67.62 | $179.93 | $1.29 | 0.72% | 0.79% | $97.78 | $97.78 | 82.82 | $14,902 |
| 2 | $14,902 | 82.82 | $218.92 | $1.36 | 0.62% | 0.82% | $121.76 | $219.54 | 95.43 | $20,892 |
| 3 | $20,892 | 95.43 | $266.35 | $1.43 | 0.54% | 0.84% | $144.71 | $364.25 | 105.89 | $28,205 |
| 4 | $28,205 | 105.89 | $324.07 | $1.51 | 0.47% | 0.85% | $166.86 | $531.11 | 114.56 | $37,127 |
| 5 | $37,127 | 114.56 | $394.30 | $1.59 | 0.40% | 0.86% | $188.42 | $719.52 | 121.75 | $48,005 |
| 6 | $48,005 | 121.75 | $479.75 | $1.68 | 0.35% | 0.86% | $209.57 | $929.10 | 127.70 | $61,263 |
| 7 | $61,263 | 127.70 | $583.71 | $1.77 | 0.30% | 0.86% | $230.50 | $1,160 | 132.63 | $77,418 |
| 8 | $77,418 | 132.63 | $710.19 | $1.86 | 0.26% | 0.86% | $251.37 | $1,411 | 136.72 | $97,095 |
| 9 | $97,095 | 136.72 | $864.09 | $1.97 | 0.23% | 0.86% | $272.31 | $1,683 | 140.10 | $121,058 |
| 10 | $121,058 | 140.10 | $1,051 | $2.07 | 0.20% | 0.86% | $293.48 | $1,977 | 142.90 | $150,238 |
S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.
Historical dividends per share
Price-led pattern. SPMO's 5-year share-price CAGR is 21.67%/yr, well above its 0.69% dividend yield. The bulk of return here is capital appreciation; dividends are a side-effect, not the story.
Yield-on-cost stays low even after years of holding. Reinvested dividends compound slowly relative to price growth.
Based on dividends paid December 2015 to March 2026.
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Cash amount | TTM yield | Fwd yield | Share price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-23 | $0.32 | 0.89% | 1.12% | $114.53 |
| 2025-12-22 | $0.29 | 0.73% | 0.97% | $120.23 |
| 2025-09-22 | $0.19 | 0.63% | 0.63% | $122.12 |
| 2025-06-23 | $0.21 | 0.60% | 0.78% | $108.42 |
| 2025-03-24 | $0.18 | 0.53% | 0.74% | $96.79 |
| 2024-12-23 | $0.19 | 0.47% | 0.80% | $96.41 |
| 2024-09-23 | $0.07 | 0.47% | 0.30% | $90.94 |
| 2024-06-24 | $0.07 | 0.74% | 0.32% | $86.19 |
| 2024-03-18 | $0.13 | 1.07% | 0.64% | $79.03 |
| 2023-12-18 | $0.16 | 1.65% | 1.02% | $64.67 |
| 2023-09-18 | $0.28 | 2.04% | 1.89% | $58.99 |
| 2023-06-20 | $0.28 | 2.19% | 2.05% | $54.64 |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.
About SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF — ticker SPMO — tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index, a single-factor index that selects the roughly 100 highest-momentum names from the S&P 500 universe. Momentum here is defined the way S&P Dow Jones Indices defines it for all of its factor indices: a risk-adjusted price-return score measured over the trailing twelve months, excluding the most recent month to reduce short-term reversal noise. The 100 names with the highest scores are included in the index and are weighted by the product of momentum score and float-adjusted market capitalization. The index is reconstituted semi-annually in March and September, which is the schedule SPMO follows for its own holdings rebalance. SPMO launched in October 2015 and charges 0.13% in annual expenses.
SPMO is best understood as a single-factor tilt on top of the S&P 500, not a dividend product. The methodology selects names that have already performed well relative to the broader market — the kind of stocks that exhibit positive 12-month price trends going into each rebalance — and weights them by how strongly they exhibit that signal. The composition therefore drifts toward whatever segment of the market has been leading: in late-cycle bull regimes, it tilts toward high-flying technology and consumer names; in defensive regimes, it tilts toward staples, utilities, and other low-beta winners. The strategy has produced strong total-return results during the post-2020 AI build-out and broader large-cap-growth leadership phase — its 5-year share-price growth rate is roughly 21.7% annualized as of the most recent data — which is the primary reason it has drawn searches from investors comparing it to QQQ or VOO.
Distributions are paid quarterly. The trailing twelve-month yield is approximately 0.69% based on a recent share price near $148 and roughly $1 in distributions over the prior four ex-dates. This is structurally low for the same reason it is low at QQQ or QQQM: momentum leadership in the modern S&P 500 has been dominated by companies that prioritize reinvestment, buybacks, and capital-return-via-appreciation over current dividend payments. The dividend stream comes from the underlying constituents passing through whatever income they generate, and momentum-style screens systematically tilt away from the higher-yield value segment of the index. Investors choosing SPMO are choosing factor exposure and total-return potential, not current income.
The measured five-year dividend growth rate is positive — roughly 8.4% annualized — but the dollar amounts involved are small, and the trajectory has been uneven from quarter to quarter because index reconstitution can swap holdings substantially at each March and September rebalance. A new entrant that pays no dividend replaces an exiting holding that did, and the next quarter's payout falls; the reverse can also happen. The trailing per-share distribution table on this page shows the actual quarterly history. Investors who use SPMO as part of a dividend-growth thesis should weight that thesis lightly relative to the underlying total-return story, because the dividend tail is small relative to the price growth tail.
How SPMO pays distributions
SPMO follows the standard US large-cap ETF quarterly distribution cadence. Ex-dividend dates fall in the final two weeks of March, June, September, and December, with the pay date approximately two business days after the ex-date. The most recent ex-dates landed on March 23, 2026, December 22, 2025, September 22, 2025, June 23, 2025, and March 24, 2025, with per-share distributions of $0.32113, $0.29092, $0.19171, $0.27420, and $0.21300 respectively. The variation across quarters reflects two effects compounding: first, the income collected from constituents during each quarter is itself variable, and second, the constituent set changes meaningfully at each semi-annual rebalance, so the income stream from one quarter to the next may come from a partially different set of underlying names.
Distributions from SPMO are predominantly qualified dividends for tax purposes. The constituents are US-domiciled S&P 500 companies whose dividends generally qualify under the IRS rules, and the open-end fund structure passes the qualified character through to shareholders who meet the holding-period requirement — more than 60 days during the 121-day window centered on the ex-date. For taxable-account holders, this means the long-term capital gains bracket applies in the tax calculator rather than the ordinary-income bracket. This is a structural advantage relative to covered-call income ETFs that pay ordinary or Section 1256 income, but the absolute dollar amounts involved are small enough that the after-tax difference is meaningful only on large positions.
DRIP enrollment works the same way as for any open-end ETF. Most brokers reinvest the cash distribution into fractional shares at the closing price near the pay date. Because SPMO's yield is so low, the DRIP effect on share count over a single year is small in absolute terms — on a $10,000 position the annual reinvestment buys roughly 0.45 of a share at current prices. Over the long horizons this site's projections cover, the effect compounds meaningfully alongside the much larger price-growth tail, which is the dominant driver of total return for a momentum-tilted product. The calculator includes DRIP by default because the long-horizon buy-and-hold use case is the dominant one for SPMO.
Who SPMO suits
SPMO suits investors who want disciplined, rules-based exposure to the momentum factor inside the S&P 500 universe rather than current income. The product solves a specific problem: it removes the behavioral barrier of having to manually rotate into leading names by codifying the rotation in an index methodology and rebalance schedule. Investors who have observed that momentum tends to persist over horizons of three to twelve months — a finding documented in factor-investing research for decades — and who want to express that view without picking individual stocks will find SPMO a clean vehicle.
The strategy is not equivalent to QQQ, VOO, or a broad large-cap blend. SPMO actively concentrates risk into whichever names have been leading; during the 2023-2025 AI rally, that meant heavy semiconductor and large-cap technology weights, but during a regime change the holdings can rotate substantially. The two semi-annual rebalances are when these rotations happen, and turnover at each rebalance is meaningful — historically running in the 60-90% range on a one-way basis. Investors looking for stable sector composition or low turnover should use a different vehicle.
SPMO is also not a substitute for a dividend ETF. The yield is approximately 0.7%, the dividend growth is uneven across rebalances, and the strategy is not designed to deliver income. Investors who are running this calculator on SPMO are almost certainly thinking about it as a tilt within a broader portfolio — perhaps paired with VOO or SCHD on the core, with SPMO providing factor exposure on the satellite — rather than as an income holding. The projection table above is most useful for sizing the modest dividend stream and the larger price-growth tail; the after-tax projection is structurally close to the pre-tax projection because the dividend share of total return is so small.
The recent strong performance is itself a factor to weigh carefully. Momentum strategies tend to do well during sustained directional regimes and poorly during sharp reversals — the 2009 V-shaped recovery and the 2022 multi-month drawdown were both regimes in which momentum-screened portfolios trailed broad benchmarks, sometimes by wide margins. Backwards-looking performance figures should not be extrapolated as a base case for the next decade. Use the calculator to sandbox a range of share-price growth assumptions — including ones meaningfully below the trailing 5-year rate — to understand the sensitivity.
Hypothetical scenarios
Three projection scenarios
SPMO has a clean ten-plus-year history since its October 2015 launch and a measurable five-year dividend growth rate of approximately 8.4% annualized. The base case below uses the measured value; the alternative scenarios explore meaningfully lower dividend growth and lower price growth to stress-test a momentum-factor strategy in less favorable regimes than the post-2020 environment. All scenarios use $10,000 as the starting investment, $200 monthly contributions, and DRIP enabled.
Base case: calculator default settings
SPMO uses the per-share dividend model — the calculator projects each year's per-share dividend by growing the prior year's amount by the assumed dividend growth rate, then multiplies by accumulated shares. The default DGR of approximately 8.4% reflects the measured trailing five-year compound annual growth rate of per-share distributions. The default share-price growth rate of approximately 21.7% reflects the measured trailing five-year price CAGR — strong by S&P 500 historical standards, driven primarily by the heavy technology and AI weighting that momentum screens have produced through this regime.
At the 5-year mark, the share count grows through both DRIP and ongoing $200 contributions, with most of the total-return tail coming from price appreciation rather than dividends — SPMO's yield is too low for dividends to drive material compounding on this horizon. At 10 years and 25 years, the compounding effect on the dividend line is meaningful but still dwarfed by the price-growth contribution. The terminal income figure in the projection table is therefore a small fraction of the terminal portfolio value, which is the expected structure for a momentum-factor product.
These numbers are mathematically correct given the inputs, but the base case embeds two strong assumptions: that momentum leadership continues to deliver returns near the trailing five-year rate, and that the underlying dividend stream continues to grow near its trailing rate. Both assumptions are sensitive to regime — the alternative scenarios below explore what happens if either or both moderate.
Lower-momentum regime: 4% DGR, 10% SPG
The lower-momentum scenario assumes the strategy continues to outperform the broad market modestly, but at roughly half the trailing rate on both the dividend and price axes. A 4% dividend growth rate is closer to the long-run S&P 500 dividend growth rate than to SPMO's trailing rate, reflecting a world where momentum leadership rotates back toward the broader composition of the index over time. A 10% share-price growth rate is closer to the long-run total-return-on-price expectation for US large-cap equity.
Compared to the base case, this scenario produces a noticeably lower terminal portfolio value at every horizon. At 5 years the gap is visible but moderate; at 25 years the divergence is large because the price growth rate compounds geometrically. The dividend income line declines proportionally with the lower DGR, but because dividends are such a small share of total return, the income figure remains a minor input to the overall outcome. Investors who use SPMO as a satellite tilt rather than a core holding may find this scenario a more honest planning baseline than the trailing-five-year extrapolation.
Reversal: 0% DGR, 5% SPG
The reversal scenario applies no dividend growth and a modest 5% annual price growth — meaningfully below long-run large-cap expectations and well below SPMO's trailing rate. This case is most relevant if momentum as a factor underperforms for a sustained period. Historical examples include the 2009 post-GFC recovery, when low-quality and high-beta names led the rally and momentum-screened portfolios trailed by wide margins, and the 2022 cross-asset drawdown, when prior momentum leaders gave back a substantial portion of their gains.
Compared to the base case, the reversal scenario produces a meaningfully lower terminal portfolio value at every horizon. The dividend income stays roughly flat in nominal terms — the share count grows from DRIP and contributions, but per-share payouts do not grow — and the terminal value is dominated by the lower price-growth assumption. Investors who are concerned about factor decay or regime change should run this scenario alongside the base case to understand the downside sensitivity, particularly if they are using SPMO as a substantial portion of an equity allocation rather than as a small satellite tilt.
Limits of these projections
The calculator provides a clean, smooth projection — but SPMO's actual behavior is regime-dependent and factor-driven, neither clean nor smooth. Four structural limits are worth keeping in mind before relying on any long-horizon output.
Trailing 5-year DGR is not a regime-neutral input
SPMO's measured five-year dividend growth rate is approximately 8.4% annualized, but this figure reflects which constituents happened to be in the index during the measurement window. Momentum leadership during 2020-2025 was dominated by large-cap technology names — many of which initiated or grew dividends meaningfully during that period — which inflated the measured dividend growth rate relative to what a regime-neutral momentum portfolio would produce. A future five-year window dominated by different sector leadership could produce a meaningfully different DGR. The base case is not a structural property of the strategy; it is an artifact of recent composition.
Trailing 5-year SPG is even more regime-dependent
The 21.7% trailing share-price growth rate is well above long-run large-cap return expectations and reflects a particularly favorable regime for momentum-style screening. Periods of cross-sector rotation, sharp reversals, or low-volatility regimes have historically produced momentum returns well below broad-market benchmarks. The calculator's default SPG should be treated as an upper bound rather than a base case for long-horizon planning. Run the lower-momentum and reversal scenarios above to size the sensitivity.
Semi-annual rebalance turnover is not modeled
The index reconstitutes in March and September, and historical turnover has run in the 60-90% range on a one-way basis at each rebalance. The calculator treats SPMO as a smooth product with a steady distribution stream, but in practice the holdings — and the income stream those holdings produce — can change substantially twice per year. Quarter-to-quarter distribution variability is therefore higher than for a market-cap-weighted broad-index ETF. The Recent dividends table on the calculator page shows the actual per-share history.
Tax treatment is approximate
For taxable accounts, the calculator's after-tax projection treats SPMO distributions as qualified dividends, which is appropriate for the vast majority of the income. A small share of distributions may classify differently year-to-year depending on the constituent mix and holding periods at the fund level — the year-end 1099 will reflect the exact split. For most retail investors, the calculator's qualified-dividend treatment is a close enough approximation, and the dollar amounts are small enough that the residual error is immaterial. Tax-advantaged account holders can disregard this caveat entirely.
Compare SPMO with another ticker
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-06-09.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Looking for a specific ETF or stock?
Browse all 83 tickers — ETFs grouped by strategy, individual stocks grouped by yield.
Browse all tickers →