ULTY Dividend Calculator
As of 2026-05-13, ULTY trades at $31.92 with a 66.96% forward dividend yield (5-year DGR not yet measurable from available history).
| Year | Yield | Div / share | Annual income | Yield on cost | Cumulative income | Portfolio value | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.8% | $21.37 | $6,696 | 54.0% | $6,696 | $19,818 | 591.30 |
| 2 | 65.0% | $22.87 | $13,524 | 91.4% | $20,220 | $37,121 | 1054.82 |
| 3 | 66.2% | $24.47 | $25,813 | 150.1% | $46,033 | $67,879 | 1836.97 |
| 4 | 67.5% | $26.18 | $48,101 | 245.4% | $94,134 | $123,005 | 3170.32 |
| 5 | 68.8% | $28.02 | $88,825 | 403.8% | $182,959 | $222,605 | 5464.20 |
| 6 | 70.1% | $29.98 | $163,811 | 671.4% | $346,770 | $404,001 | 9444.59 |
| 7 | 71.4% | $32.08 | $302,959 | 1130.4% | $649,729 | $737,008 | 16409.07 |
| 8 | 72.8% | $34.32 | $563,207 | 1928.8% | $1,212,937 | $1,353,261 | 28694.86 |
| 9 | 74.2% | $36.73 | $1,053,834 | 3334.9% | $2,266,771 | $2,502,920 | 50545.25 |
| 10 | 75.6% | $39.30 | $1,986,243 | 5841.9% | $4,253,014 | $4,665,212 | 89725.43 |
| 11 | 77.0% | $42.05 | $3,772,692 | 10364.5% | $8,025,706 | $8,765,640 | 160560.41 |
| 12 | 78.5% | $44.99 | $7,223,672 | 18617.7% | $15,249,378 | $16,606,240 | 289692.22 |
| 13 | 80.0% | $48.14 | $13,945,695 | 33848.8% | $29,195,073 | $31,724,844 | 527079.02 |
| 14 | 81.5% | $51.51 | $27,149,562 | 62269.6% | $56,344,635 | $61,125,292 | 967181.26 |
| 15 | 83.1% | $55.12 | $53,306,327 | 115883.3% | $109,650,962 | $118,790,496 | 1790108.39 |
| 16 | 84.6% | $58.97 | $105,568,412 | 218116.6% | $215,219,374 | $232,875,731 | 3342200.99 |
| 17 | 86.2% | $63.10 | $210,897,292 | 415152.1% | $426,116,666 | $460,563,104 | 6295180.35 |
| 18 | 87.9% | $67.52 | $425,040,578 | 798948.5% | $851,157,244 | $919,001,139 | 11963156.49 |
| 19 | 89.6% | $72.24 | $864,274,656 | 1554450.8% | $1,715,431,900 | $1,850,308,181 | 22939529.39 |
| 20 | 91.3% | $77.30 | $1,773,267,588 | 3057357.9% | $3,488,699,488 | $3,759,344,065 | 44387758.17 |
| 21 | 93.0% | $82.71 | $3,671,442,755 | 6078547.6% | $7,160,142,244 | $7,708,303,867 | 86680351.42 |
| 22 | 94.8% | $88.50 | $7,671,459,400 | 12215699.7% | $14,831,601,644 | $15,952,289,685 | 170842361.28 |
| 23 | 96.6% | $94.70 | $16,178,441,043 | 24813559.9% | $31,010,042,687 | $33,322,943,793 | 339880774.55 |
| 24 | 98.4% | $101.33 | $34,439,075,319 | 50945377.7% | $65,449,118,006 | $70,268,146,207 | 682578234.77 |
| 25 | 100.3% | $108.42 | $74,005,005,720 | 105721436.7% | $139,454,123,725 | $149,591,561,835 | 1383922394.50 |
Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)
Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.
Historical dividends per share
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Pay date | Cash amount | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 2026-05-14 | $0.40 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-05-06 | 2026-05-07 | $0.40 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-04-29 | 2026-04-30 | $0.40 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-04-22 | 2026-04-23 | $0.44 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-04-15 | 2026-04-16 | $0.40 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-04-08 | 2026-04-09 | $0.42 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-02 | $0.37 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-03-25 | 2026-03-26 | $0.43 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-03-18 | 2026-03-19 | $0.41 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-03-11 | 2026-03-12 | $0.42 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-03-04 | 2026-03-05 | $0.48 | 52× / yr |
| 2026-02-25 | 2026-02-26 | $0.48 | 52× / yr |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 8-12 dividend distributions, most recent first.
About ULTY
ULTY — the YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF — is an actively managed option-income fund that distributes weekly. Unlike the single-name YieldMax products such as MSTY (built on MSTR) or NVDY (built on NVDA), ULTY does not anchor itself to one underlying. Instead, the manager rotates across a basket of roughly 15 to 30 high-implied-volatility names — typically a mix of mega-cap technology, single-stock leveraged ETFs, crypto-adjacent equities, and other names where short-dated option premium is unusually rich at the time of selection. The holdings list is not static: positions enter and exit the basket as the relative attractiveness of their option premium shifts, which is the defining feature of ULTY relative to the rest of the YieldMax lineup.
The income engine itself is the same synthetic call structure used across the YieldMax family. ULTY does not hold the underlying equities directly. For each rotation candidate, the fund layers on a synthetic options position — a long call at a lower strike paired with a short call at a higher strike — designed to replicate the payout profile of a covered-call position without taking direct equity exposure. Distributions are funded by the net premium collected from selling the upper calls across the basket, not by dividends from any of the underlying companies. Because the basket is rebalanced actively and concentrates in names selected for elevated implied volatility, ULTY's distribution stream is, in effect, a monetization of cross-sectional volatility — the manager harvests premium wherever the option market is currently paying the most for it.
"Diversified weekly option income" is the way the fund tends to be described, and both halves of that phrase deserve attention. "Diversified" here means diversified across underlyings — not diversified across strategies or asset classes. Every leg of the structure is a short-call premium harvest, so the basket's exposure to a market-wide volatility regime shift is correlated even when the individual underlyings are not. When realized volatility collapses across the high-beta complex, premiums shrink in tandem and distributions contract regardless of how many names are in the basket. "Weekly" means the operational rhythm — declarations, ex-dates, payments — runs on a one-week cycle rather than the monthly cycle used by MSTY, NVDY, and most of the older YieldMax products.
The same structural NAV-erosion risk that defines the YieldMax single-name funds applies to ULTY. When any underlying in the basket rallies sharply above the short-call strike, the synthetic short-call position loses value at roughly the same rate the long position gains, capping the fund's net asset value contribution from that name. Across a basket of high-volatility holdings, large upside moves happen frequently — semiconductor names, leveraged ETFs, and crypto-linked equities all produce regular double-digit single-session moves. Each such move erodes a portion of ULTY's NAV. The diversified basket smooths the per-name impact but does not eliminate the structural lid on upside that is the cost of selling the calls in the first place.
How ULTY pays distributions
ULTY distributes weekly — 52 payments per year. The standard cadence places the ex-dividend date on a Tuesday and the pay date on the following Thursday, which means each week's distribution moves from declaration to cash in roughly two business days. The per-share amount changes from week to week as the basket rotates and as implied volatility across the underlyings shifts. Because each distribution reflects a single week of premium harvest rather than a month's worth, the absolute dollar amount per payment is small, but the cadence multiplies the compounding cycles. Investors who run DRIP on ULTY are reinvesting roughly four times more frequently than a monthly-paying fund — every reinvestment buys a slightly different share count at a slightly different price.
Most of ULTY's distribution is classified as return of capital (ROC) rather than ordinary or qualified dividends. ROC treatment means the distribution is not taxed as income in the year received; instead, it reduces the shareholder's cost basis. A lower cost basis defers the tax liability until the shares are sold, at which point the gain is measured against the reduced basis and taxed at capital-gains rates. For investors in high marginal tax brackets, the ROC treatment tends to be more favorable than ordinary income — but it is not tax-free; it shifts the obligation forward rather than eliminating it. Holders who sell after a long holding period may face a larger capital-gains bill than the annual 1099 history suggested. The weekly cadence does not change this treatment — 52 ROC payments per year have the same tax character as 12 ROC payments per year, just spread more finely.
The implication for compounding is mostly mechanical. Weekly DRIP increases the number of reinvestment events but does not increase total distributions — a 67% forward yield paid weekly is the same total annual cash as a 67% yield paid monthly, just delivered in smaller, more frequent slices. The practical effect of more frequent reinvestment is a marginally higher effective annual yield from compounding, and a smoother accumulation curve when share prices are moving. Tax-advantaged accounts sidestep the basis question entirely — in an IRA, Roth IRA, or 401(k), the weekly distributions reinvest without current tax consequences regardless of classification. Holders who want to maximize the mechanical compounding of a weekly high-yield option-income strategy often prefer to run it inside a tax-advantaged wrapper for exactly this reason.
Who ULTY suits
ULTY suits a specific kind of income investor: one who is comfortable with a high headline yield delivered in volatile weekly slices, accepts that the underlying basket changes without notice, and trusts the manager's rotation decisions across a universe of high-implied-volatility names. The fund is, in effect, a discretionary volatility-harvesting product wrapped in an ETF. Investors who want to know exactly what they own each week, or who want a static basket with a published methodology rather than active rotation, will be uncomfortable with the way ULTY operates.
The fund tends to work best as a sidesleeve income holding rather than a core position. A high-yield, NAV-eroding, option-premium-harvesting ETF is a different animal from a broad equity index fund, and sizing should reflect that difference. Investors who use ULTY as a sleeve for boosting portfolio income — for example, dedicating a small percentage of total assets to high-yield option-income exposure and accepting that the principal may erode over time — get the income contribution without betting their full plan on a single structural assumption. Investors who concentrate heavily in ULTY are taking on the full NAV-erosion risk of the structure with none of the diversification across strategy types that a balanced income portfolio would provide.
Tax-advantaged accounts are the natural home for ULTY for the same reasons that apply to MSTY and NVDY. Weekly ROC distributions reinvest cleanly inside an IRA or 401(k) without any current-year tax friction, and the eventual basis adjustment is irrelevant because the account is sheltered. In a taxable account, the weekly cadence creates 52 cost-basis adjustments per year per lot, which complicates record-keeping; the underlying tax economics are favorable in high brackets, but the bookkeeping burden is real. Brokerages handle the ROC reclassification automatically at year-end, but holders should still expect to see basis numbers change after the 1099 is finalized.
ULTY launched in 2024, which means there is no meaningful long-term track record and no five-year dividend growth rate by definition. The 67% forward yield reflects current option-premium conditions across the rotation basket, not a steady-state outcome. Any projection using a non-zero DGR is an assumption, not a historical extrapolation — and for a fund whose holdings rotate actively, even short-history DGR estimates would be of limited value because the composition driving the distributions is not constant. Use the calculator above to model multiple scenarios, and review the scenarios page for guidance on base-case, flat, and shrinking-distribution assumptions. For a comparable YieldMax structure built on a single underlying rather than a rotating basket, see the MSTY and NVDY calculators.
Hypothetical scenarios
Three projection scenarios
The calculator on this page uses ULTY's current forward yield of approximately 67% as its starting point. Because ULTY launched in 2024 and has fewer than five full calendar years of history, there is no computed five-year dividend growth rate. The calculator's default 7% annual DGR is a generic fallback, not a forecast derived from ULTY's actual payout history — and for an actively rotated basket, even a longer history would not produce a particularly meaningful DGR because the underlying holdings driving the distributions are not constant. The three scenarios below explore what the default assumption implies versus more conservative alternatives — all using $10,000 as the starting investment, $200 monthly contributions, and DRIP enabled.
Base case: 67% yield, 7% DGR
The base case applies the calculator's default settings. At a 67% forward yield, the starting annual income on $10,000 is roughly $6,700 — a substantial fraction of the initial investment returned as distributions in year one, spread across 52 weekly payments of a few dollars each. With DRIP enabled and $200 monthly contributions, the share count grows continuously: every weekly distribution reinvests at the prevailing price, and new contributions add lots roughly every four weeks. Apply a 7% DGR on top of that compounding and the projected income trajectory rises steeply over long horizons.
At the 5-year mark, the combination of weekly share-count compounding and the assumed DGR produces a substantially higher annual income run-rate than year one. At 10 years, the compounding effect is dramatic — far exceeding what the initial $10,000 would suggest at face value. At 25 years, the projection implies an income stream that dwarfs the original capital by a wide margin. The weekly cadence amplifies the compounding effect slightly relative to a monthly-paying fund at the same headline yield, because reinvestments occur about four times as often.
These numbers are mathematically correct given the inputs — but they should be treated with deep skepticism for ULTY specifically. A 7% annual growth in ULTY's per-share distribution assumes that the option premium environment across the rotation basket, the manager's selection decisions, and the fund's NAV trajectory all remain favorable over decades. None of those conditions is reliable, and the 7% DGR is a generic placeholder, not a ULTY-specific estimate. The base-case output is most useful as a benchmark to compare against the flat and shrinking scenarios below.
Flat distribution: 67% yield, 0% DGR
The flat-distribution scenario assumes option premiums across the rotation basket — and therefore per-share weekly distributions — stay roughly constant in nominal terms over the projection period. No growth, no decline. The same 67% starting yield compounds purely through share-count accumulation under weekly DRIP and ongoing $200 monthly contributions.
Compared to the base case, this outcome produces a noticeably lower annual income at each time horizon. At 5 years the gap is visible; at 25 years the divergence is large. The flat scenario is arguably the more realistic planning assumption for an actively rotated option-income fund with no dividend-growth history — it captures the compounding from reinvested distributions without embedding an optimistic premium-growth assumption that has no underlying support. Investors who want a conservative floor for planning purposes should weight this scenario more heavily than the base case.
Shrinking distribution: 67% yield, -3% DGR
The shrinking-distribution scenario applies a -3% annual decline in per-share payouts. This is especially relevant for ULTY because two distinct forces can compress per-share distributions over time: NAV erosion across the basket reduces the asset base on which future premiums are earned, and broad declines in market-wide implied volatility shrink the absolute premium dollars available to harvest regardless of basket composition. Either force, or both in combination, would push the per-share weekly distribution lower year over year.
Compared to the base case, a -3% DGR scenario produces meaningfully lower income at every horizon — and compared to the flat case, the shortfall widens each year. At longer horizons, the shrinking-distribution case illustrates how NAV erosion and volatility normalization can work against compounding even when weekly DRIP is reinvesting every dollar. Investors who have observed ULTY's NAV trajectory since launch and want to model a continuation of that trend, or who want to stress-test the projection against a return to historically average implied volatility levels, should run this case alongside the base and flat cases.
Limits of these projections
The calculator provides a clean, smooth projection — but ULTY's actual behavior is neither clean nor smooth. Several structural limits are worth keeping in mind before relying on any long-horizon output, and the weekly cadence amplifies most of them relative to the monthly-paying YieldMax products.
Weekly distribution variance is high and finer-grained than monthly
ULTY's weekly distributions vary more frequently and more granularly than the monthly distributions on funds like MSTY or NVDY. Each weekly payment reflects a single week of premium harvest across a rotating basket, so the per-share amount can swing meaningfully from one Thursday to the next depending on which names are in the basket, what their implied volatility looks like, and what the option market paid for the relevant strikes during the prior week. The calculator assumes a smooth annualized stream — the week-to-week swings are invisible in the projection table. Before relying on ULTY distributions as a regular income source, review the Recent dividends table on the calculator page to get a sense of actual variance. With 52 payments per year, the granularity of the swings is higher than a monthly fund, and budgeting around the average is likely to produce a meaningful number of undershoot weeks.
No five-year DGR exists for ULTY, and the rotation makes DGR less meaningful
ULTY launched in 2024. The five-year DGR field in the computed data is null by definition — not because the data is missing, but because the fund has not existed long enough to produce one. The 7% DGR the calculator uses as a fallback is the same default applied to every ticker without a computed DGR. It has no specific relationship to ULTY's payout history or forward outlook. Compounding this, ULTY's actively rotated basket means even a longer-history DGR would be partially measuring different underlying exposures over time rather than a consistent strategy. Users should treat long-horizon projections with extra caution and experiment with 0% and negative DGR values as alternative inputs.
NAV erosion and rotation drift are not modeled
The most important structural risks for ULTY are NAV erosion and rotation drift, and the calculator models neither. A 25-year projection assumes that the share count accumulated through weekly DRIP retains its value — but the underlying basket changes continuously, and the fund's NAV is exposed to capped-upside dynamics across every name currently held. In the real world, the same share count bought at a higher NAV is worth less as NAV falls, and the strategy being run on a given share next year may not be the strategy being run on it today. The calculator's compounding math is correct given its assumptions; the gap between those assumptions and ULTY's observed behavior is the main reason to use multiple scenarios and to monitor actual NAV alongside income. After-tax modeling for ROC distributions is also not yet integrated — for taxable accounts, the calculator treats distributions as ordinary income, which understates the actual after-tax yield given ULTY's largely-ROC classification. Tax-advantaged account holders can disregard that caveat entirely.
Compare ULTY with another ticker
Compare functionality launching soon.
Open a brokerage account to start buying ULTY
Open a brokerage account in minutes — commission-free trades, no account minimum.
Get started →Brokerage partner links coming soon — not active yet.
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-05-14.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.