VIG

VIG Dividend Calculator

$234.651.42% fwd yield8.67% 5-yr SPGclose 2026-05-29 · Polygon.io

Real-time refresh paused — values may lag.

Dividend growth rate (CAGR)

1Y: 5.29%2Y: 5.31%5Y: 9.15%10Y: 6.94%All: 7.38%
YearStart BalanceStart SharesShare PriceDividend / ShareDividend YieldYield on CostAnnual DividendTotal DividendsEnd SharesEnd Balance
1$10,00042.62$254.99$3.331.31%1.30%$160.67$160.6753.05$13,527
2$13,52753.05$277.10$3.641.31%1.43%$211.94$372.6162.83$17,412
3$17,41262.83$301.13$3.971.32%1.56%$268.83$641.4572.04$21,692
4$21,69272.04$327.23$4.331.32%1.69%$331.94$973.3980.70$26,409
5$26,40980.70$355.61$4.731.33%1.83%$401.94$1,37588.88$31,608
6$31,60888.88$386.44$5.161.34%1.97%$479.59$1,85596.62$37,336
7$37,33696.62$419.94$5.631.34%2.11%$565.69$2,421103.95$43,651
8$43,651103.95$456.35$6.151.35%2.26%$661.17$3,082110.90$50,611
9$50,611110.90$495.92$6.711.35%2.43%$767.04$3,849117.53$58,285
10$58,285117.53$538.91$7.331.36%2.60%$884.42$4,733123.85$66,744
These numbers assume your starting yield, dividend growth rate, and share-price growth all hold for 10 years straight. Real markets don't work that way — companies cut dividends, ETFs change strategy, prices swing in ways the inputs above can't capture. Use this projection to compare scenarios (more contribution vs less, DRIP on vs off, 10 years vs 25), not as a number you'll see in your brokerage account.
DRIP gained you+$2,040 over 10 years
Loading projection chart…

S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.

Historical dividends per share

Loading dividend history chart…

Dividend-led pattern. Over 5 years VIG's dividend grew 9.15%/yr — roughly 1.5× VOO (5.91%) and 2.4× VYM (3.79%). Share price grew 8.67%/yr in the same window.

For reinvesters, each DRIP buys cheaper income than the previous — yield-on-cost compounds upward. For total-return investors, dividend growth here is outpacing capital appreciation.

Based on dividends paid June 2011 to March 2026.

Recent dividends

Ex-dateCash amountTTM yieldFwd yieldShare price
2026-03-27$0.831.64%1.58%$210.73
2025-12-22$0.881.61%1.60%$220.95
2025-09-29$0.861.65%1.61%$214.59
2025-06-30$0.871.72%1.70%$204.67
2025-03-27$0.941.82%1.93%$194.58
2024-12-23$0.881.71%1.78%$197.12
2024-09-27$0.841.73%1.69%$197.28
2024-06-28$0.901.84%1.97%$182.55
2024-03-22$0.771.78%1.70%$181.26
2023-12-21$0.921.90%2.17%$169.14
2023-09-28$0.772.03%1.97%$156.10
2023-06-29$0.771.93%1.92%$160.79

Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.

About VIG

The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF — ticker VIG — is the Vanguard flagship in the dividend-growth ETF category and one of the largest dividend-focused ETFs in the US market by assets under management, with AUM running above $80 billion in recent years. The fund launched in April 2006 and has accumulated nearly two decades of distribution history. It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, an index Vanguard switched to in 2021 after migrating away from the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index it had previously tracked. The methodology change preserved the same underlying construction principle — screen the US large-cap universe for companies with long-running dividend hike streaks — but transferred the index provider responsibility to S&P.

The S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index applies a 10-consecutive-year dividend growth requirement as its central screen. A constituent must have raised its per-share dividend in each of the last ten fiscal years to be eligible; a missed hike removes the name at the next rebalance. The index also explicitly excludes REITs and applies a top-25%-by-yield exclusion at reconstitution to filter out names whose yield is high relative to peers (the screen is designed to remove distressed-yield names rather than to maximize current yield). The resulting basket holds approximately 330 names — five times the breadth of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index that NOBL tracks, which uses a 25-year streak requirement and typically holds around 65 names. The two indices are different reads on the same broad question: NOBL is the long-streak basket; VIG is the medium-streak large-basket equivalent.

The expense ratio is the Vanguard hallmark — around 0.05-0.06%, the lowest in the dividend-growth ETF category by a wide margin and an order of magnitude below most actively managed dividend funds. Over a multi-decade compounding horizon the expense-ratio drag on VIG is structurally minimal, which is the central reason the fund has captured such a large share of dividend-ETF AUM in the Vanguard custodial channel.

The sector composition is where VIG looks structurally different from SCHD even though both are "dividend ETFs." Because the 10-year hike requirement captures a wider universe than NOBL's 25-year filter, VIG holds names that have grown dividends consistently through the 2010s tech-led market — Microsoft, Apple, Broadcom, Visa, Mastercard, and similar mega-cap tech-adjacent dividend growers all clear the 10-year screen and appear in VIG, often at meaningful weights given the market-cap-weighted index construction. The result is a sector tilt heavier in Information Technology and Financials, lighter in Utilities and Consumer Staples than SCHD's FTSE-methodology basket would produce, and with zero REIT exposure by index rule. SCHD's quality-plus-yield methodology, by contrast, captures more mature dividend payers and tilts toward Financials, Consumer Staples, Healthcare, and Energy with a yield-weighted final ranking; SCHD typically excludes lower-yielding mega-cap tech names that VIG includes. Index choice matters enormously: two funds labeled "dividend ETF" can produce very different forward yield and growth profiles based purely on which provider's methodology they track.

How VIG pays dividends

VIG distributes cash dividends quarterly, on an approximately March–June–September–December cadence. Each quarter the fund collects the aggregate dividends paid by its ~330 underlying holdings during the period, retains a small portion for the fund's expenses, and distributes the remainder pro rata to shareholders on the official pay date. The per-share distribution amount is therefore the bottom-up sum of the underlying holdings' payouts, scaled by the fund's share count and net of the ~0.05% expense ratio. There is no managed-distribution policy, no covered-call overlay, and no return of capital — VIG is a straight pass-through wrapper around the aggregated cash flow of the underlying constituent set.

The index reconstitutes annually, typically in March, with quarterly weight rebalances in between. At reconstitution S&P recomputes eligibility against the 10-year hike requirement and the yield-exclusion screen, and adds or removes names accordingly. A company that stops growing its dividend — a freeze or a cut — does not exit the index immediately; it remains in the basket until the next March reconstitution, at which point S&P removes it and the index reweights without that name. This rebalance lag is structurally important to understand: a company that cut in February will continue to be a VIG holding through the remainder of the year until the following March, and any distribution cut at that holding flows through to VIG's aggregate distribution during the interim. The lag is the standard mechanical feature of any rules-based index ETF and is not specific to VIG, but it differs from how an actively managed fund might respond to a dividend cut (sell immediately) and is worth knowing for any holder who treats the ETF as if it dynamically tracks dividend hiking behavior in real time.

Weights drift between rebalances. The index is market-cap-weighted within the eligible set, so a holding that appreciates substantially during the year carries a larger weight in the basket — and a larger share of the aggregate distribution calculation — until the next rebalance resets the weights. This drift is mild compared with the equal-weighting feature of NOBL, where quarterly rebalances aggressively pull every name back to equal weight, but it is nonzero and accumulates over a one-year window.

DRIP through Schwab, Fidelity, Vanguard, IBKR, or Robinhood works the same way it does for any quarterly US dividend ETF — the cash distribution buys additional VIG shares at the prevailing price on or near the pay date, with fractional-share reinvestment supported. The fund's distributions are predominantly qualified dividends, since the underlying holdings are US large-cap C-corporations whose payouts meet the IRS qualified-dividend definition. The pass-through preserves character: qualified dividends collected by the fund pass through to the shareholder as qualified, and the small portion of ordinary income (if any) passes through as ordinary. For shareholders who meet the standard sixty-one-day holding-period requirement around the ex-date, the bulk of VIG distributions qualify for the long-term capital-gains tax rate in taxable accounts.

Who VIG suits

VIG fits the set-and-forget dividend-growth investor — the holder who wants broad large-cap exposure tilted toward companies with multi-year hike discipline, a very low expense ratio, and an index methodology that does the rebalancing work automatically. The starting yield typically runs in the low-to-mid 1% range — below SCHD, below VYM, and meaningfully below high-yield funds like SPYD — and the annual distribution growth has historically run in the high single digits, reflecting the fact that the basket is composed by construction of names with consistent hike track records.

The trade-off versus NOBL is structural. NOBL is the strictest streak filter (25 years) on the smallest basket (~65 names), equal-weighted, with rebalances back to equal weight. VIG is the medium streak filter (10 years) on a much broader basket (~330 names), market-cap-weighted. NOBL produces a basket that maps cleanly onto the Aristocrats list and emphasizes streak durability; VIG produces a basket that includes most Aristocrats plus the larger pool of companies whose hike history is long enough to meet the 10-year test but not yet 25 years — including the mega-cap tech names whose dividend programs only began in the 2000s and 2010s. The forward yield on VIG runs below NOBL's because the broader basket includes more low-yield-high-growth names like the tech mega-caps; the historical dividend growth has run somewhat higher than NOBL's for the same reason.

The trade-off versus SCHD is about index methodology and growth tilt. SCHD's FTSE-derived methodology selects for quality (return on equity, cash flow stability, debt-to-equity) and current yield, producing a basket with higher starting yield, less tech exposure, and more concentration in mature dividend payers. VIG's S&P methodology selects for length of hike streak with a yield-cap to exclude distressed names, producing a basket with lower starting yield, more tech exposure, and a tilt toward names that have grown dividends from a low base over the last decade. Over a long horizon SCHD has historically delivered both higher current cash and higher historical dividend growth on a rolling basis, but the divergence depends on which window is measured; VIG's tech-heavy tilt has helped on total return (price + income) during tech-led market regimes and hurt during value-led regimes.

Many income investors hold more than one of VIG, SCHD, and NOBL together as complementary slices of a dividend-grower portfolio — VIG for the broadest large-cap growth-tilted exposure, SCHD for the higher current yield with quality screen, and NOBL for the strictest streak discipline on a concentrated equal-weighted basket. The methodology diversification is the structural argument for holding more than one: each index is making a different bet on what the "right" definition of a dividend grower is, and combining them produces a basket whose exposure does not depend on any single index provider's methodology being optimal. As with any ETF holding, this content is educational only; it is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold VIG, and individual circumstances vary.

Hypothetical scenarios

Scenario 1: VIG versus SCHD versus NOBL — picking the dividend-grower flavor

Consider the structural comparison among the three most-held dividend-growth ETFs in the US market: VIG, SCHD, and NOBL. All three label themselves as quality-oriented dividend funds, but each tracks a different index with a different selection methodology, and the resulting baskets diverge enough that the calculator output on identical inputs produces materially different income trajectories. The calculator on this page can model VIG directly; for a side-by-side comparison, run the same starting capital and contribution pattern through the SCHD and NOBL ticker pages and compare the year-20 income lines.

VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index — a 10-year hike requirement on a broad market-cap-weighted basket of roughly 330 names. The starting yield typically runs in the low-to-mid 1% range; the historical annual distribution growth has run in the high single digits; the sector mix is tilted toward Information Technology and Financials and excludes REITs by index rule. The structural bet is breadth-plus-growth: a wide basket of companies that have grown dividends for at least a decade, weighted by market cap so the largest dividend growers (Microsoft, Apple, Broadcom, Visa, JPMorgan) anchor the basket.

SCHD tracks the Dow Jones US Dividend 100 Index — a quality-plus-yield methodology that requires a 10-year dividend history, applies return-on-equity, debt-to-equity, and cash flow stability screens, then ranks the eligible set by yield and dividend growth, taking the top 100 names with a single-stock weight cap. The starting yield typically runs above VIG and NOBL — in the mid-3% range historically — because the final ranking explicitly weights yield. The sector mix is heavier in mature dividend payers (Financials, Consumer Staples, Healthcare, Energy) and lighter in tech. The structural bet is yield-plus-quality on a more concentrated basket.

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index — a 25-year hike requirement on the S&P 500 universe, equal-weighted, typically around 65 names. The starting yield runs between VIG and SCHD in most rolling windows; the historical annual distribution growth has run in the mid-single-digit range; the basket is the smallest, equal-weighted, with the strictest streak filter. The structural bet is streak durability at any current yield level.

The calculator-side guidance is direct: model each at its current forward yield and trailing five-year DGR, run the same horizon and contribution pattern, and compare the year-10, year-15, and year-20 annual income figures. SCHD usually leads in year-1 absolute cash; VIG's mega-cap tech tilt produces higher historical DGR but lower starting yield, so the income line crosses SCHD's somewhere depending on the realized growth differential; NOBL's mid-single-digit DGR on a moderate starting yield produces a steadier line that competes on durability rather than peak income. The honest reading is that these three funds make three different bets on what "dividend growth investing" should mean, and the calculator output makes the trade-offs explicit rather than abstract.

Scenario 2: VIG in a tax-advantaged versus taxable account

VIG's distribution character makes the account-placement decision relatively simple compared with high-yield or option-income alternatives. The bulk of distributions are qualified dividends — the pass-through structure preserves the qualified character of the underlying holdings' payouts, and since the basket is composed almost entirely of US large-cap C-corporations whose payouts meet the qualified-dividend definition, very little ordinary income leaks through. For shareholders who meet the standard sixty-one-day holding-period requirement around the ex-date, qualified distributions are taxed at long-term capital-gains rates (0%, 15%, or 20% federal depending on income bracket, plus the 3.8% net investment income tax above the threshold) rather than ordinary income rates.

In a taxable account, the structural argument for VIG over a high-yield ETF like SPYD is the lower year-1 tax friction. A position generating a low-to-mid 1% yield produces meaningfully less taxable income per dollar invested than a position generating a 4-5% yield, and the dollars not paid in tax stay invested and compound. The dividend-growth path is what closes the gap over the long run: as the per-share dividend grows in the high single digits annually, the position's yield-on-cost rises into the range of what a higher-yield-lower-growth alternative would have produced — but the income line that was reinvested during the accumulation phase compounded without the early-years tax drag. This is the standard dividend-growth-in-taxable argument, and VIG's structural fit for it is the combination of low starting yield, qualified character, and high-single-digit historical DGR.

In a Roth IRA or other tax-advantaged wrapper, the qualified-versus-ordinary distinction disappears because no current-year tax applies to distributions inside the wrapper. DRIP compounding runs untaxed: every quarterly distribution buys more shares, those shares produce more next-quarter distributions, and the share count compounds without any tax friction reducing the per-quarter reinvestment dollar amount. Over a 20-30 year accumulation horizon the Roth-wrapped DRIP outcome is structurally the best because the compounding is uninterrupted; the standard guidance for income-oriented holdings is to prioritize tax-advantaged placement when available, and VIG is no exception.

The comparison to holding the top components directly — Microsoft, Apple, Broadcom, Visa, JPMorgan, and so on as individual positions — is worth thinking through. The ETF wrapper costs roughly 0.05% per year in expense ratio drag; in exchange the holder gets automatic rebalancing as new names cross the 10-year hike threshold and existing names lose eligibility, full diversification across the ~330-name basket rather than concentration in a handful of mega-caps, and no rebalancing labor for the holder. A self-built portfolio of the top 10 holdings saves the expense ratio (zero on individual stocks) but concentrates the position, requires the holder to monitor each name's hike streak and rebalance when one breaks, and exposes the position to single-name dividend-cut risk. For a holder with conviction on a specific subset of dividend growers, direct holdings make sense; for a holder who wants the broad dividend-grower category as a core position without the per-name maintenance work, VIG at 0.05% is the lowest-friction wrapper available. As with any ETF holding, this content is educational only; the calculator output is a model based on user-supplied inputs, not a forecast of realized future outcomes.

Compare VIG with another ticker

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-30.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.