VTI Dividend Calculator

Live data$367.401.03% fwd yield11.3% 5-yr SPGclose 2026-05-14 · Polygon.io

Dividend growth rate (CAGR)

1Y: 2.24%2Y: 4.92%5Y: 6.29%10Y: All: 6.29%
YearYieldDiv / shareAnnual incomeYield on costCumulative incomePortfolio valueShares
10.9%$3.78$103.000.8%$103.00$13,76933.67
20.9%$4.03$135.570.9%$238.57$17,99939.53
30.8%$4.28$169.401.0%$407.96$22,74444.87
40.8%$4.56$204.611.0%$612.57$28,06249.74
50.8%$4.85$241.321.1%$853.90$34,02254.17
60.7%$5.16$279.671.1%$1,134$40,69658.21
70.7%$5.49$319.781.2%$1,453$48,16961.89
80.7%$5.85$361.801.2%$1,815$56,53165.25
90.6%$6.22$405.881.3%$2,221$65,88768.31
100.6%$6.62$452.191.3%$2,673$76,35071.11

Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)

Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.

Historical dividends per share

Recent dividends

Ex-dateCash amountTTM yieldFwd yieldShare price
2026-03-27$1.001.2%1.3%$313.09
2025-12-22$0.951.4%1.1%$337.60
2025-09-29$0.911.1%1.1%$327.10
2025-06-30$0.911.2%1.2%$303.93
2025-03-27$0.991.3%1.4%$278.99
2024-12-23$0.941.2%1.3%$294.00
2024-09-27$0.871.3%1.2%$282.05
2024-06-28$0.951.4%1.4%$267.51
2024-03-22$0.911.4%1.4%$258.50
2023-12-21$1.001.8%1.7%$236.09
2023-09-21$0.801.9%1.5%$214.09
2023-06-23$0.831.6%1.5%$214.94

Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of last 12 months of payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.

About VTI

VTI — the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF — is a passive, cap-weighted fund providing exposure to essentially the entire investable US equity universe. Launched in 2001, it tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, which includes roughly four thousand US-listed stocks spanning mega-cap, large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap, and micro-cap segments. The expense ratio is among the lowest of any equity ETF, and the fund is one of the most widely held US equity holdings across both individual and institutional accounts. VTI's pitch is simple: own a single ticker that captures the whole US stock market, weighted by market capitalization.

VTI is not a dividend strategy. The fund's distributions are an incidental byproduct of owning the full US equity market — VTI passes through the dividends paid by its underlying constituents, but it is not selected or screened for dividend yield, dividend quality, or dividend growth. The headline yield typically sits in the one-to-one-and-a-half-percent range, which reflects the weighted-average yield of the broad US market dominated by mega-cap technology constituents (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, Tesla) that pay modest dividends or none at all. Income-focused investors who run a dividend calculator on VTI will find the projected annual cash flow per dollar invested significantly smaller than the same calculation on SCHD, VYM, or any of the option-income ETFs. That gap is structural — it is the price of holding the broad market rather than a yield-tilted slice of it.

The total-return case for VTI is overwhelmingly about price appreciation, not dividends. The CRSP US Total Market Index has historically returned roughly nine-to-eleven percent annualized over long rolling periods, with the dividend component contributing only one-to-two percentage points of that total. For investors planning around long-horizon wealth accumulation rather than current income, VTI's small dividend stream is a side feature; the meaningful driver is the path of US equity prices. The dividend calculator on this page can model VTI's distribution stream, but the output should be read with the understanding that it ignores the dominant component of the fund's historical return.

VTI's holdings are broader than SPY, VOO, or IVV — the latter three track only the S&P 500, which is the largest five hundred US companies. VTI adds the mid-cap, small-cap, and micro-cap layers below the S&P 500, holding several thousand additional names. In practice the overlap with VOO is high — the S&P 500 dominates total US market capitalization — but the additional holdings give VTI a modest tilt toward smaller companies and a slightly different historical return path. For dividend-income purposes the differences are negligible: both VTI and VOO yield roughly the same percentage, both pay quarterly, both have similar dividend growth profiles tied to the broad US dividend universe.

How VTI pays dividends

VTI distributes cash dividends quarterly on a calendar-quarter schedule. Ex-dividend dates typically fall in the third or fourth week of March, June, September, and December, with the pay date following a few business days later. The per-share cash amount reflects the aggregate dividends collected from the portfolio's thousands of holdings during the quarter, scaled by index weight and net of the fund's expense ratio. Quarter-to-quarter amounts vary modestly because constituents pay on different schedules within the quarter; year-end distributions can be larger when constituents pay special or year-end dividends.

VTI's distributions are composed almost entirely of qualified dividends — income from underlying US companies that meets the IRS holding-period requirements. For shareholders who also meet the qualified-dividend holding requirement (generally sixty-one days around the ex-date), these distributions are taxed at long-term capital gains rates rather than ordinary income rates. This is a meaningful tax advantage compared to option-income ETFs whose distributions include return-of-capital and ordinary income components. In tax-advantaged accounts the wrapper shelters the income entirely and the qualified-versus-ordinary distinction is irrelevant.

The annual distribution has grown steadily since VTI's inception in 2001, rising at a mid-single-digit annualized pace consistent with the broader US market's dividend growth rate. The growth comes from two sources: the per-share dividend paid by the average US company has risen as constituents hike their payouts, and the index weights have shifted as some non-dividend-paying companies grow into mega-cap and other mature dividend payers remain in the basket. The five-year DGR computed from VTI's recent distribution history is in the six-to-seven percent range, in line with VOO's profile and slightly different from VYM (which tilts toward higher-yielding names with more modest dividend growth) or SCHD (which screens for stronger dividend growth specifically).

Who VTI suits

VTI suits investors who want broad, low-cost exposure to the US equity market as a total-return holding — not as a dividend-income holding. The dividend calculator on this page can be run on VTI, but the relevant planning question for a VTI holder is rarely "what will the dividend stream look like in twenty-five years." It is more often "what will the total portfolio value look like, including price appreciation and dividends combined." The dividend calculator models only the income component; for VTI specifically, that component is a small fraction of the historical total return.

The income-focused investor running a calculator on VTI is typically doing one of two things. First, using VTI as a baseline comparison against income-oriented alternatives like SCHD, VYM, JEPI, or JEPQ — running each fund through the same calculator with identical inputs to see how the projected income lines diverge. In that role VTI is the floor: it shows the income line for an investor who chose total-return exposure rather than yield-focused exposure. Second, modeling yield-on-cost growth from a VTI entry held for decades, which is a real and meaningful number even though the starting yield is small. At a six-to-seven percent DGR compounding over twenty-five years, VTI's yield-on-cost from today's entry reaches a yield level several times the current market yield by the end of the projection window.

For investors specifically seeking dividend income, VYM, SCHD, and the covered-call ETFs are the higher-yield alternatives. VYM offers roughly two-to-three times VTI's yield with broad US dividend exposure; SCHD offers a similar yield with a tighter quality-screened basket and more robust historical dividend growth; JEPI and JEPQ offer high-single-digit-to-low-double-digit yields through covered-call premium harvesting at the cost of capped equity upside. The choice between VTI and any of those alternatives is not a comparison of two flavors of dividend strategy — it is a choice between income-focused exposure and total-return exposure. VTI's role in an income-focused comparison set is to anchor the opposite side of the trade-off: lower income today, smoother compounding, and the full broad US market total return profile. Real outcomes depend on the fund's underlying constituents, expense ratios, tax treatment in your specific account, and the broader path of US equity markets.

Hypothetical scenarios

Scenario 1: $10,000 invested in VTI fifteen years ago

Consider a hypothetical purchase of $10,000 of VTI fifteen years ago, when shares traded in the mid-sixties. That initial capital would have purchased roughly 150 shares. The fund paid four quarterly distributions that year, and by holding the position with dividends reinvested through DRIP, the share count compounded each quarter as new dividends purchased fractional shares at the prevailing market price.

Across the fifteen-year window, three structural forces operated together. First, the per-share annual distribution grew at a mid-single-digit pace on a rolling basis, with year-to-year variation tracking the broad US dividend universe. The five-year DGR computed from VTI's recent history is in the six-to-seven percent range. Second, the share count grew as DRIP reinvested every quarter at the prevailing price — but slowly, because VTI's entry yield in the one-to-one-and-a-half-percent range produced a small distribution stream to reinvest relative to a higher-yielding income fund. Third, the share price rose substantially over the fifteen-year window in line with the broader US equity market, lifting the dollar value of the share count.

The dividend-only output of this scenario is modest. By the end of the fifteen-year window, the cash income received in the final year is roughly two-to-three times the income paid in year one on the same initial position, driven mostly by per-share distribution growth with a smaller contribution from DRIP-driven share-count accumulation. But the dollar value of the position itself has grown several times the original investment, driven primarily by price appreciation. The total return is dominated by the price line, not the income line — and the dividend calculator on this page models only the income line. Reading the projection without understanding this gap will significantly understate what VTI has historically delivered.

This is the central planning consideration for VTI specifically. The fund is a total-return holding, and any analysis that models only its dividend stream is answering the wrong question for a typical VTI holder. The scenario is offered as a structural illustration of how the income line compounds at VTI's profile; for a full-picture analysis including price appreciation, use a total-return or portfolio backtest tool (such as Portfolio Visualizer or a compound-return calculator) in addition to this dividend projection.

Scenario 2: VTI as a baseline against income-oriented alternatives

Consider a hypothetical comparison run: $50,000 invested in VTI versus $50,000 invested in SCHD, VYM, JEPI, or any income-focused alternative, with DRIP enabled and identical inputs on each. The calculator on this page can run any of these tickers with the same parameters — set Initial investment to $50,000, time horizon to 20 years, DRIP on, and run each ticker through the same projection.

The dollar-income lines diverge meaningfully. VTI's starting annual income on $50,000 is roughly $500-$750 at the current yield. VYM's starting income on the same capital is two-to-three times that. SCHD is in the same ballpark as VYM, with a tighter quality-screened basket. JEPI's starting income is five-to-seven times VTI's. The divergence widens over the projection window as each fund's distinct DGR profile compounds: VTI's six-to-seven percent DGR is comparable to SCHD's but starts from a much lower base; VYM's lower DGR is offset by the higher starting yield; JEPI's near-zero structural DGR keeps the line flatter but at a much higher absolute level.

This comparison is the most useful way to think about VTI on a dividend calculator. VTI's projection is the floor; the income-oriented alternatives lift the line at the cost of trading away some part of the total-return profile (sector concentration, quality screen, options-overlay drag, NAV-erosion risk depending on which alternative is chosen). The right holding for a given investor depends on whether the planning need is income today or total return over the horizon — and for the rare investor whose plan rests on a specific dollar amount of income from a specific dollar amount of capital, the calculator's side-by-side projection is the cleanest way to see which holding meets the need.

What the comparison cannot show is the total-return picture. VTI may have a smaller dividend stream than each of the income-oriented alternatives, but historically it has produced a larger total return because the broad US market has compounded faster than yield-tilted or covered-call-overlaid baskets over multi-decade windows. The trade-off between income today and total return over time is the structural choice an investor makes when picking VTI versus SCHD/VYM/JEPI/JEPQ. The dividend calculator on this page surfaces one side of that trade-off; the other side requires a separate total-return analysis. Educational only; not a forecast.

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-15.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.