YMAX Dividend Calculator
Dividend growth rate not yet measurable from available history.
Yield-based dividend model — distributions are computed as a % of current NAV. See methodology
Long-horizon projection caveat
This fund combines a very high starting yield (59.0%) with significant historical NAV erosion (-31.0% annualized). The 25-year projection assumes those mechanics persist for the full horizon. Funds of this type — single-name option-income, futures-roll income, ultra-high distribution rates — historically have much shorter useful lifespans, and the late-year numbers (share count, portfolio value) should be read as illustrative of the trajectory rather than a literal forecast.
| Year | Start Balance | Start Shares | Share Price | Dividend / Share | Dividend Yield | Yield on Cost | Annual Dividend | Total Dividends | End Shares | End Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $10,000 | 1218.03 | $5.67 | $3.34 | 58.97% | 46.50% | $5,766 | $5,766 | 2448.78 | $13,880 |
| 2 | $13,880 | 2448.78 | $3.91 | $2.31 | 58.97% | 52.48% | $7,767 | $13,533 | 4666.74 | $18,262 |
| 3 | $18,262 | 4666.74 | $2.70 | $1.59 | 58.97% | 58.29% | $10,027 | $23,559 | 8591.40 | $23,212 |
| 4 | $23,212 | 8591.40 | $1.87 | $1.10 | 58.97% | 64.18% | $12,579 | $36,138 | 15440.91 | $28,802 |
| 5 | $28,802 | 15440.91 | $1.29 | $0.76 | 58.97% | 70.28% | $15,461 | $51,599 | 27267.64 | $35,115 |
| 6 | $35,115 | 27267.64 | $0.89 | $0.52 | 58.97% | 76.71% | $18,717 | $70,316 | 47515.31 | $42,246 |
| 7 | $42,246 | 47515.31 | $0.61 | $0.36 | 58.97% | 83.56% | $22,394 | $92,710 | 81942.49 | $50,299 |
| 8 | $50,299 | 81942.49 | $0.42 | $0.25 | 58.97% | 90.91% | $26,546 | $119,256 | 140150.65 | $59,394 |
| 9 | $59,394 | 140150.65 | $0.29 | $0.17 | 58.97% | 98.85% | $31,236 | $150,492 | 238108.97 | $69,667 |
| 10 | $69,667 | 238108.97 | $0.20 | $0.12 | 58.97% | 107.45% | $36,534 | $187,026 | 402321.12 | $81,269 |
| 11 | $81,269 | 402321.12 | $0.14 | $0.08 | 58.97% | 116.80% | $42,516 | $229,542 | 676694.40 | $94,372 |
| 12 | $94,372 | 676694.40 | $0.10 | $0.06 | 58.97% | 126.99% | $49,273 | $278,815 | 1133853.18 | $109,172 |
| 13 | $109,172 | 1133853.18 | $0.07 | $0.04 | 58.97% | 138.12% | $56,904 | $335,720 | 1893757.14 | $125,886 |
| 14 | $125,886 | 1893757.14 | $0.05 | $0.03 | 58.97% | 150.28% | $65,523 | $401,243 | 3154318.89 | $144,764 |
| 15 | $144,764 | 3154318.89 | $0.03 | $0.02 | 58.97% | 163.60% | $75,258 | $476,501 | 5241723.00 | $166,084 |
| 16 | $166,084 | 5241723.00 | $0.02 | $0.01 | 58.97% | 178.21% | $86,252 | $562,753 | 8693078.57 | $190,164 |
| 17 | $190,164 | 8693078.57 | $0.02 | $0.01 | 58.97% | 194.23% | $98,669 | $661,422 | 14392116.51 | $217,361 |
| 18 | $217,361 | 14392116.51 | $0.01 | $0.01 | 58.97% | 211.83% | $112,693 | $774,115 | 23791880.26 | $248,077 |
| 19 | $248,077 | 23791880.26 | $0.01 | $0 | 58.97% | 231.17% | $128,532 | $902,647 | 39280044.61 | $282,768 |
| 20 | $282,768 | 39280044.61 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 252.45% | $146,421 | $1,049,068 | 64778015.73 | $321,949 |
| 21 | $321,949 | 64778015.73 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 275.87% | $166,624 | $1,215,692 | 106723134.78 | $366,200 |
| 22 | $366,200 | 106723134.78 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 301.66% | $189,443 | $1,405,135 | 175678556.77 | $416,178 |
| 23 | $416,178 | 175678556.77 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 330.08% | $215,215 | $1,620,349 | 288971327.46 | $472,624 |
| 24 | $472,624 | 288971327.46 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 361.42% | $244,321 | $1,864,671 | 475014492.66 | $536,375 |
| 25 | $536,375 | 475014492.66 | $0 | $0 | 58.97% | 395.99% | $277,195 | $2,141,866 | 780387014.91 | $608,377 |
S&P 500 is included only as a total-portfolio-value reference — it isn't the most meaningful benchmark for income-focused strategies. The 10% baseline reflects the index's long-term nominal total return (price + dividends), a reference rather than a forecast.
Explore alternative scenarios
- Model yield slowly normalizing → set
Annual dividend growthto-3%to-5% - Model NAV stabilization → set
Annual share price growthto0%or-10% - Compare against flat-distribution baseline → set both to
0%
Historical dividends per share
Distribution-decay pattern. YMAX's trailing 12-month distribution yield is 72.73% — roughly 22× SCHD's 3.27%. NAV has fallen at -30.96%/yr since inception. The two numbers describe the same machine: option-premium and return-of-capital distributions cycling out, NAV cycling down.
For monthly-cash-flow strategies, the headline is real but funded partly by the principal generating it. For buy-and-hold, the NAV trajectory is the dominant signal.
Based on dividends paid April 2025 to June 2026.
Recent dividends
| Ex-date | Cash amount | TTM yield | Fwd yield | Share price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | $0.09 | 70.25% | 56.96% | $8.50 |
| 2026-05-27 | $0.09 | 71.10% | 55.12% | $8.51 |
| 2026-05-20 | $0.09 | 73.69% | 56.16% | $8.38 |
| 2026-05-13 | $0.09 | 73.68% | 56.83% | $8.51 |
| 2026-05-06 | $0.08 | 73.71% | 49.59% | $8.64 |
| 2026-04-29 | $0.10 | 78.04% | 62.69% | $8.27 |
| 2026-04-22 | $0.10 | 76.27% | 60.63% | $8.56 |
| 2026-04-15 | $0.09 | 79.39% | 57.91% | $8.27 |
| 2026-04-08 | $0.09 | 84.70% | 60.07% | $7.80 |
| 2026-04-01 | $0.09 | — | 59.01% | $7.71 |
| 2026-03-25 | $0.03 | — | 21.84% | $8.00 |
| 2026-03-18 | $0.08 | — | 51.87% | $8.26 |
Source: Polygon.io. Last 12 dividend distributions, most recent first. TTM yield = sum of this payment + (frequency − 1) prior payments ÷ share price on ex-date. Forward yield = this payment × detected payout frequency ÷ share price on ex-date.
About YMAX
YMAX — the YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs — is a fund-of-funds wrapper that holds the full slate of YieldMax single-name option-income ETFs in roughly equal weights. Launched in 2024, YMAX does not run its own options strategy. It does not write calls on any underlying stock, hold a synthetic long-short structure, or harvest premium directly. Instead, it owns shares of the other YieldMax products — MSTY, NVDY, TSLY, CONY, AMZY, AAPY, and the remaining sleeves in the family — and passes through the distributions those underlying funds generate. The wrapper rebalances periodically toward equal weights and aggregates the cash flows into a single weekly distribution paid to YMAX shareholders.
The diversification story is the main reason YMAX exists. A direct holder of MSTY is fully exposed to MSTR's volatility regime and to MSTY's own NAV trajectory; a direct holder of TSLY is fully exposed to Tesla; and so on. Each YieldMax single-name fund carries the same structural risk — NAV erosion when the underlying makes a large upside move that the short-call lid caps. Owning fifteen-to-twenty of these sleeves at equal weight smooths that risk across the basket. A single explosive rally in one underlying erodes only that sleeve's share of YMAX's NAV, not the whole portfolio. The fund-of-funds structure trades concentrated single-name exposure for diversified single-name exposure across the YieldMax universe.
The cost of that diversification is a layered expense ratio. YMAX charges its own management fee, and the underlying YieldMax ETFs each charge their own fees on top of that — typically in the 0.99% range per sleeve. The total expense load borne by a YMAX shareholder is therefore the YMAX fee plus the weighted average fee of the underlying funds, which is meaningfully higher than holding any single YieldMax product directly. Investors who want exposure to the same set of strategies and are willing to manage the rebalancing themselves can replicate the basket at lower total cost by buying the underlying sleeves in their own brokerage account. YMAX's value proposition is the operational simplicity of a single ticker, weekly cadence, and built-in rebalancing — not lower fees.
On aggregate, YMAX carries the same NAV-erosion exposure as the underlyings it holds. The fund-of-funds structure smooths the variance of any single sleeve's NAV trend but does not eliminate the systemic property that synthetic covered-call ETFs lose NAV during large underlying rallies. If the YieldMax universe collectively experiences a period of strong upside moves across its referenced stocks, YMAX's NAV will trend down in line with the weighted average decline. The diversification reduces idiosyncratic risk; it does not change the structural payoff profile of the YieldMax strategy.
How YMAX pays distributions
YMAX distributes weekly — 52 payments per calendar year. The ex-dividend date typically falls on a Tuesday and the pay date follows on the Thursday of the same week. This weekly cadence is the wrapper's own reformatting of the underlying flows: the YieldMax single-name ETFs distribute monthly, so the cash YMAX receives from its holdings arrives in roughly monthly bursts spread across the underlying funds' staggered ex-dates. YMAX smooths those inbound monthly flows into a regular weekly outbound stream, drawing on accumulated cash and recently received distributions to fund each Thursday's payment.
Because each weekly payment is a slice of an underlying monthly flow, per-share weekly amounts at YMAX are smaller in absolute terms than the monthly distributions paid by any single YieldMax sleeve. The aggregate annualized distribution, however, reflects the same combined cash generation as the underlying basket — the wrapper neither adds nor subtracts income relative to what the underlyings generate, aside from the fee drag. Investors used to thinking in monthly per-share amounts should multiply YMAX's weekly figure by roughly 4.33 to compare against a monthly cadence. The smoothing effect also reduces the headline variance from week to week compared to the swings any single underlying produces month to month, though over a full quarter the variance reasserts itself as the underlying premiums fluctuate.
Most of YMAX's distributions are classified as return of capital (ROC), inheriting the tax treatment of the underlying YieldMax funds. ROC means the distribution is not taxed as income in the year received; instead, it reduces the shareholder's cost basis. A lower cost basis defers the tax liability until the shares are sold, at which point the gain is measured against the reduced basis and taxed at capital-gains rates. For investors in high marginal tax brackets, ROC treatment is more favorable than ordinary income, but it is not tax-free — it shifts the obligation forward. Tax-advantaged accounts sidestep the basis question entirely. In an IRA, Roth IRA, or 401(k), distributions reinvest without current tax consequences regardless of their classification, which is why high-yield option-income wrappers like YMAX are frequently held inside tax-advantaged sleeves.
Who YMAX suits
YMAX suits income investors who want broad exposure to the YieldMax option-income strategy without picking individual single-name sleeves and without managing the rebalancing themselves. It is, in effect, a one-ticker proxy for the whole YieldMax catalog. A holder who would otherwise need to research, buy, and periodically rebalance fifteen-to-twenty separate ETFs can substitute YMAX and get an approximately equal-weight exposure with a weekly distribution cadence built in. For investors whose conviction is in the YieldMax strategy generally rather than in any specific underlying name, that operational simplicity is the core appeal.
The fit profile assumes the investor has accepted the layered fee structure. Total annual costs on YMAX run materially higher than holding any single underlying YieldMax sleeve, because the YMAX fee stacks on top of the weighted average fee of the holdings. An investor with the time and discipline to buy and rebalance the underlying sleeves directly can capture nearly the same exposure at a lower total expense ratio. YMAX is the convenience layer; the convenience is not free, and on a multi-decade compounding horizon the fee drag compounds against the investor.
YMAX is also explicitly not a buy-and-forget holding for stable income. The fund inherits the NAV-erosion property of its underlyings on aggregate. The diversification across many YieldMax sleeves smooths the path — large drawdowns in any single name affect only that sleeve's slice of YMAX — but the long-term direction of the basket's NAV tracks the weighted average of the underlyings, which has trended down since launch for most of the single-name YieldMax products. A high headline yield on a slowly eroding NAV is a recurring pattern in this fund family, and YMAX is not exempt from it. Investors should track total return (income plus or minus price change) alongside the distribution line, not yield in isolation.
YMAX launched in 2024, which means there is no meaningful long-term track record and no five-year dividend growth rate by definition — the fund has not existed for five full calendar years. Any projection using a non-zero DGR is an assumption, not a historical extrapolation. Investors who want lower fees and are comfortable with single-name exposure may prefer to hold MSTY or NVDY directly; investors who want broader, lower-yield covered-call exposure with a longer track record may prefer JEPI or JEPQ. YMAX occupies a specific niche: diversified YieldMax exposure in a single weekly-paying ticker, at a layered cost. Use the calculator above to model multiple scenarios, and review the scenarios page for guidance on base-case, flat, and shrinking-distribution assumptions.
Hypothetical scenarios
Three projection scenarios
Because YMAX launched in 2024 and has fewer than five full calendar years of history, the calculator's default DGR is 0% — no positive measured growth window exists for the fund or for the weighted history of its underlying YieldMax sleeves. The base case below therefore overlaps the explicit 'Flat' case — both assume per-share distributions stay roughly constant in nominal terms. The 'Shrinking' case explores the alternative where aggregate NAV erosion across the underlying sleeves progressively reduces per-share payouts. All scenarios use $10,000 as the starting investment, $200 monthly contributions, and DRIP enabled.
Base case: calculator default settings
YMAX uses the yield-based dividend model — distributions are computed as yield × NAV at each projection step. With the default DGR of 0%, the yield is maintained at its current level across the projection; with the measured share-price growth rate of -30.9%, the per-share dividend amount declines proportionally as NAV erodes. The base case therefore models the distributions you'd receive if the current yield-on-NAV ratio holds steady while NAV continues its observed decline trajectory. At the calculator's current forward yield, the starting annual income on a $10,000 position scales linearly — see the projection table for precise figures. With DRIP enabled and $200 monthly contributions, the share count grows each week from reinvested distributions and each month from new capital.
At the 5-year mark, share-count compounding from DRIP and contributions produces a higher annual income run-rate than year one even with 0% DGR. At 10 years and 25 years, the compounding effect grows more pronounced — driven entirely by share accumulation, not distribution growth.
These numbers are mathematically correct given the inputs — but they should be treated with deep skepticism for YMAX specifically. The option premium environment across the entire YieldMax universe, the volatility regimes of fifteen-to-twenty referenced stocks, and the aggregate NAV trajectory of the underlying sleeves are all uncertain over multi-decade horizons. The base-case output (identical to the flat case) is most useful as a reference point to compare against the shrinking scenario below.
Flat distribution: 57% yield, 0% DGR
The flat-distribution scenario assumes the aggregate option premium environment across the YieldMax underlyings — and therefore YMAX's per-share weekly distributions — stays roughly constant in nominal terms over the projection period. No growth, no decline. The same 57% starting yield compounds purely through share-count accumulation under DRIP and ongoing $200 contributions.
Compared to the base case, this outcome produces a noticeably lower annual income at each time horizon. At 5 years the gap is visible; at 25 years the divergence is large. The flat scenario is arguably the more realistic planning assumption for a fund-of-funds option-income wrapper with no dividend-growth history — it captures the compounding from reinvested weekly distributions without embedding an optimistic premium-growth assumption. Investors who want a conservative floor for planning purposes should weight this scenario more heavily than the base case.
Shrinking distribution: 57% yield, -3% DGR
The shrinking-distribution scenario applies a -3% annual decline in per-share payouts. This is especially relevant for YMAX because the fund-of-funds wrapper inherits the NAV-erosion exposure of its underlyings on aggregate. As the underlying YieldMax sleeves experience NAV decay during periodic upside moves in their referenced stocks, the absolute dollar amount of premium that flows up to YMAX per share tends to decline even if the yield-on-NAV at each underlying stays high. The layered fee structure adds an additional small drag on top of that.
Compared to the base case, a -3% DGR scenario produces meaningfully lower income at every horizon — and compared to the flat case, the shortfall widens each year. At longer horizons, the shrinking-distribution case illustrates how NAV erosion at the underlying level translates upward through the wrapper even when DRIP is reinvesting every dollar at YMAX. Investors who have observed the YieldMax single-name funds' NAV trajectories since launch and want to model a continuation of that trend at the fund-of-funds level should run this case alongside the base and flat cases.
Limits of these projections
The calculator provides a clean, smooth projection — but YMAX's actual behavior depends on the aggregate behavior of fifteen-to-twenty underlying YieldMax sleeves, none of which is clean or smooth. Three structural limits are worth keeping in mind before relying on any long-horizon output.
The wrapper smooths variance but not the long-term trend
YMAX's weekly distribution stream is the reformatted output of its underlyings' monthly distributions, averaged across the equal-weight basket. Week-to-week variance at YMAX is meaningfully lower than month-to-month variance at any single underlying — a single sleeve's bad month is diluted by the other sleeves' contributions. That smoothing is real and useful for cash-flow planning. What the smoothing does not change is the long-term trend: if the weighted average of the underlying YieldMax funds experiences NAV erosion over a multi-year horizon, YMAX experiences the same erosion on aggregate. The wrapper is a variance-reduction layer, not a structural fix for the option-income payoff profile. The calculator assumes a smooth annualized stream; the smoothing matches YMAX's actual cadence reasonably well, but the projection table does not show the underlying NAV trend that will eventually flow through to per-share distributions.
The layered fee structure compounds against the holder
YMAX charges its own management fee on top of the underlying YieldMax ETFs' fees. The total expense load is the sum of the wrapper fee and the weighted average fee of the holdings, which runs materially higher than direct ownership of any single sleeve. The calculator's projection does not explicitly subtract a fee line item — it works from the realized net yield, which already reflects fees. But on a multi-decade compounding horizon, even a small incremental fee gap between YMAX and direct sleeve ownership compounds into a visible drag on terminal income. Investors comparing YMAX projections to projections for MSTY, NVDY, or a hand-rolled equal-weight basket of YieldMax sleeves should adjust the long-horizon outputs downward for YMAX to reflect the incremental fee load.
No five-year DGR exists for YMAX or the YieldMax universe
YMAX launched in 2024. The five-year DGR field in the computed data is null by definition. Most of YMAX's underlyings also have less than three years of operating history. The calculator's default DGR for YMAX is 0% — no positive measured growth window exists across any time horizon for the fund or its underlying sleeves. Users should treat long-horizon projections with extra caution. The flat case (0% DGR) and the shrinking case (-3% DGR) are the two most relevant scenarios given YMAX's short history and the aggregate NAV-erosion dynamics of the YieldMax universe. For taxable-account holders, also note that YMAX's distributions are largely classified as return of capital, which the calculator's after-tax view does not yet handle specially — the after-tax projection in the calculator treats distributions as ordinary income, understating the actual after-tax yield for taxable holders. Tax-advantaged account holders can disregard that caveat entirely.
Compare YMAX with another ticker
Sources & methodology
Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.
Last updated: 2026-06-09.
Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Looking for a specific ETF or stock?
Browse all 87 tickers — ETFs grouped by strategy, individual stocks grouped by yield.
Browse all tickers →