YMAX Dividend Calculator

As of 2026-05-13, YMAX trades at $8.51 with a 57.27% forward dividend yield (5-year DGR not yet measurable from available history).

YearYieldDiv / shareAnnual incomeYield on costCumulative incomePortfolio valueShares
154.5%$4.87$5,72746.2%$5,727$18,8252106.79
255.6%$5.21$10,98774.2%$16,714$33,4803568.39
356.6%$5.58$19,911115.8%$36,625$58,0095888.42
457.7%$5.97$35,157179.4%$71,782$99,3829607.76
558.8%$6.39$61,378279.0%$133,160$169,68515623.15
659.9%$6.84$106,794437.7%$239,954$290,02725431.55
761.1%$7.31$186,009694.1%$425,963$497,53341549.61
862.2%$7.83$325,1711113.6%$751,134$857,97068238.30
963.4%$8.37$571,4221808.3%$1,322,557$1,488,687112763.88
1064.6%$8.96$1,010,3762971.7%$2,332,932$2,600,598187607.72
1165.9%$9.59$1,798,6534941.4%$4,131,585$4,575,609314367.07
1267.1%$10.26$3,224,9088311.6%$7,356,493$8,110,413530691.09
1368.4%$10.98$5,825,13414138.7%$13,181,627$14,485,602902705.54
1469.7%$11.74$10,602,15224316.9%$23,783,779$26,073,0811547435.71
1571.0%$12.57$19,446,62742275.3%$43,230,406$47,300,1302673580.62
1672.4%$13.45$35,950,81574278.5%$79,181,221$86,495,2594656224.99
1773.8%$14.39$66,993,581131877.1%$146,174,803$159,450,0518174797.79
1875.2%$15.40$125,851,974236563.9%$272,026,777$296,346,54714469813.30
1976.6%$16.47$238,357,992428701.4%$510,384,769$555,337,93425824451.03
2078.1%$17.63$455,178,423784790.4%$965,563,192$1,049,387,62546475106.87
2179.5%$18.86$876,505,6981451168.4%$1,842,068,889$1,999,743,35184346957.34
2281.1%$20.18$1,702,109,6932710365.8%$3,544,178,583$3,843,357,540154389104.55
2382.6%$21.59$3,333,638,8615112943.0%$6,877,817,443$7,450,475,002285036530.57
2484.2%$23.10$6,585,461,3119741806.7%$13,463,278,755$14,569,083,529530834933.57
2585.8%$24.72$13,122,873,81018746962.6%$26,586,152,565$28,740,484,067997314289.67

Year 1-10 dividend income (preview)

Based on a $10,000 initial investment with $200.00 monthly contributions, DRIP on.

Historical dividends per share

Recent dividends

Ex-datePay dateCash amountFrequency
2026-05-132026-05-14$0.0952× / yr
2026-05-062026-05-07$0.0852× / yr
2026-04-292026-04-30$0.1052× / yr
2026-04-222026-04-23$0.1052× / yr
2026-04-152026-04-16$0.0952× / yr
2026-04-082026-04-09$0.0952× / yr
2026-04-012026-04-02$0.0952× / yr
2026-03-252026-03-26$0.0352× / yr
2026-03-182026-03-19$0.0852× / yr
2026-03-112026-03-12$0.0852× / yr
2026-03-042026-03-05$0.0852× / yr
2026-02-252026-02-26$0.0752× / yr

Source: Polygon.io. Last 8-12 dividend distributions, most recent first.

About YMAX

YMAX — the YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs — is a fund-of-funds wrapper that holds the full slate of YieldMax single-name option-income ETFs in roughly equal weights. Launched in 2024, YMAX does not run its own options strategy. It does not write calls on any underlying stock, hold a synthetic long-short structure, or harvest premium directly. Instead, it owns shares of the other YieldMax products — MSTY, NVDY, TSLY, CONY, AMZY, AAPY, and the remaining sleeves in the family — and passes through the distributions those underlying funds generate. The wrapper rebalances periodically toward equal weights and aggregates the cash flows into a single weekly distribution paid to YMAX shareholders.

The diversification story is the main reason YMAX exists. A direct holder of MSTY is fully exposed to MSTR's volatility regime and to MSTY's own NAV trajectory; a direct holder of TSLY is fully exposed to Tesla; and so on. Each YieldMax single-name fund carries the same structural risk — NAV erosion when the underlying makes a large upside move that the short-call lid caps. Owning fifteen-to-twenty of these sleeves at equal weight smooths that risk across the basket. A single explosive rally in one underlying erodes only that sleeve's share of YMAX's NAV, not the whole portfolio. The fund-of-funds structure trades concentrated single-name exposure for diversified single-name exposure across the YieldMax universe.

The cost of that diversification is a layered expense ratio. YMAX charges its own management fee, and the underlying YieldMax ETFs each charge their own fees on top of that — typically in the 0.99% range per sleeve. The total expense load borne by a YMAX shareholder is therefore the YMAX fee plus the weighted average fee of the underlying funds, which is meaningfully higher than holding any single YieldMax product directly. Investors who want exposure to the same set of strategies and are willing to manage the rebalancing themselves can replicate the basket at lower total cost by buying the underlying sleeves in their own brokerage account. YMAX's value proposition is the operational simplicity of a single ticker, weekly cadence, and built-in rebalancing — not lower fees.

On aggregate, YMAX carries the same NAV-erosion exposure as the underlyings it holds. The fund-of-funds structure smooths the variance of any single sleeve's NAV trend but does not eliminate the systemic property that synthetic covered-call ETFs lose NAV during large underlying rallies. If the YieldMax universe collectively experiences a period of strong upside moves across its referenced stocks, YMAX's NAV will trend down in line with the weighted average decline. The diversification reduces idiosyncratic risk; it does not change the structural payoff profile of the YieldMax strategy.

How YMAX pays distributions

YMAX distributes weekly — 52 payments per calendar year. The ex-dividend date typically falls on a Tuesday and the pay date follows on the Thursday of the same week. This weekly cadence is the wrapper's own reformatting of the underlying flows: the YieldMax single-name ETFs distribute monthly, so the cash YMAX receives from its holdings arrives in roughly monthly bursts spread across the underlying funds' staggered ex-dates. YMAX smooths those inbound monthly flows into a regular weekly outbound stream, drawing on accumulated cash and recently received distributions to fund each Thursday's payment.

Because each weekly payment is a slice of an underlying monthly flow, per-share weekly amounts at YMAX are smaller in absolute terms than the monthly distributions paid by any single YieldMax sleeve. The aggregate annualized distribution, however, reflects the same combined cash generation as the underlying basket — the wrapper neither adds nor subtracts income relative to what the underlyings generate, aside from the fee drag. Investors used to thinking in monthly per-share amounts should multiply YMAX's weekly figure by roughly 4.33 to compare against a monthly cadence. The smoothing effect also reduces the headline variance from week to week compared to the swings any single underlying produces month to month, though over a full quarter the variance reasserts itself as the underlying premiums fluctuate.

Most of YMAX's distributions are classified as return of capital (ROC), inheriting the tax treatment of the underlying YieldMax funds. ROC means the distribution is not taxed as income in the year received; instead, it reduces the shareholder's cost basis. A lower cost basis defers the tax liability until the shares are sold, at which point the gain is measured against the reduced basis and taxed at capital-gains rates. For investors in high marginal tax brackets, ROC treatment is more favorable than ordinary income, but it is not tax-free — it shifts the obligation forward. Tax-advantaged accounts sidestep the basis question entirely. In an IRA, Roth IRA, or 401(k), distributions reinvest without current tax consequences regardless of their classification, which is why high-yield option-income wrappers like YMAX are frequently held inside tax-advantaged sleeves.

Who YMAX suits

YMAX suits income investors who want broad exposure to the YieldMax option-income strategy without picking individual single-name sleeves and without managing the rebalancing themselves. It is, in effect, a one-ticker proxy for the whole YieldMax catalog. A holder who would otherwise need to research, buy, and periodically rebalance fifteen-to-twenty separate ETFs can substitute YMAX and get an approximately equal-weight exposure with a weekly distribution cadence built in. For investors whose conviction is in the YieldMax strategy generally rather than in any specific underlying name, that operational simplicity is the core appeal.

The fit profile assumes the investor has accepted the layered fee structure. Total annual costs on YMAX run materially higher than holding any single underlying YieldMax sleeve, because the YMAX fee stacks on top of the weighted average fee of the holdings. An investor with the time and discipline to buy and rebalance the underlying sleeves directly can capture nearly the same exposure at a lower total expense ratio. YMAX is the convenience layer; the convenience is not free, and on a multi-decade compounding horizon the fee drag compounds against the investor.

YMAX is also explicitly not a buy-and-forget holding for stable income. The fund inherits the NAV-erosion property of its underlyings on aggregate. The diversification across many YieldMax sleeves smooths the path — large drawdowns in any single name affect only that sleeve's slice of YMAX — but the long-term direction of the basket's NAV tracks the weighted average of the underlyings, which has trended down since launch for most of the single-name YieldMax products. A high headline yield on a slowly eroding NAV is a recurring pattern in this fund family, and YMAX is not exempt from it. Investors should track total return (income plus or minus price change) alongside the distribution line, not yield in isolation.

YMAX launched in 2024, which means there is no meaningful long-term track record and no five-year dividend growth rate by definition — the fund has not existed for five full calendar years. Any projection using a non-zero DGR is an assumption, not a historical extrapolation. Investors who want lower fees and are comfortable with single-name exposure may prefer to hold MSTY or NVDY directly; investors who want broader, lower-yield covered-call exposure with a longer track record may prefer JEPI or JEPQ. YMAX occupies a specific niche: diversified YieldMax exposure in a single weekly-paying ticker, at a layered cost. Use the calculator above to model multiple scenarios, and review the scenarios page for guidance on base-case, flat, and shrinking-distribution assumptions.

Hypothetical scenarios

Three projection scenarios

The calculator on this page uses YMAX's current forward yield of approximately 57% as its starting point. Because YMAX launched in 2024 and has fewer than five full calendar years of history, there is no computed five-year dividend growth rate. The calculator's default 7% annual DGR is a generic fallback, not a forecast derived from YMAX's actual payout history or from the weighted history of its underlying YieldMax sleeves. The three scenarios below explore what that default assumption implies versus more conservative alternatives — all using $10,000 as the starting investment, $200 monthly contributions, and DRIP enabled.

Base case: 57% yield, 7% DGR

The base case applies the calculator's default settings. At a 57% forward yield, the starting annual income on $10,000 is roughly $5,700 — more than half the initial investment returned as distributions in year one, paid out across 52 weekly installments. With DRIP enabled and $200 monthly contributions, the share count grows each week from reinvested distributions and each month from new capital. Apply a 7% DGR on top of that compounding and the projected income trajectory rises steeply over long horizons.

At the 5-year mark, the combination of share-count compounding and the assumed DGR produces a substantially higher annual income run-rate than year one. At 10 years, the compounding effect is dramatic — far exceeding what the initial $10,000 would suggest at face value. At 25 years, the projection implies an income stream that dwarfs the original capital by a wide margin.

These numbers are mathematically correct given the inputs — but they should be treated with deep skepticism for YMAX specifically. A 7% annual growth in per-share distribution assumes the option premium environment across the entire YieldMax universe, the volatility regimes of fifteen-to-twenty referenced stocks, and the aggregate NAV trajectory of the underlying sleeves all remain favorable over decades. None of those conditions is reliable, and the 7% DGR is a generic placeholder, not a YMAX-specific estimate. The base-case output is most useful as a benchmark to compare against the flat and shrinking scenarios below.

Flat distribution: 57% yield, 0% DGR

The flat-distribution scenario assumes the aggregate option premium environment across the YieldMax underlyings — and therefore YMAX's per-share weekly distributions — stays roughly constant in nominal terms over the projection period. No growth, no decline. The same 57% starting yield compounds purely through share-count accumulation under DRIP and ongoing $200 contributions.

Compared to the base case, this outcome produces a noticeably lower annual income at each time horizon. At 5 years the gap is visible; at 25 years the divergence is large. The flat scenario is arguably the more realistic planning assumption for a fund-of-funds option-income wrapper with no dividend-growth history — it captures the compounding from reinvested weekly distributions without embedding an optimistic premium-growth assumption. Investors who want a conservative floor for planning purposes should weight this scenario more heavily than the base case.

Shrinking distribution: 57% yield, -3% DGR

The shrinking-distribution scenario applies a -3% annual decline in per-share payouts. This is especially relevant for YMAX because the fund-of-funds wrapper inherits the NAV-erosion exposure of its underlyings on aggregate. As the underlying YieldMax sleeves experience NAV decay during periodic upside moves in their referenced stocks, the absolute dollar amount of premium that flows up to YMAX per share tends to decline even if the yield-on-NAV at each underlying stays high. The layered fee structure adds an additional small drag on top of that.

Compared to the base case, a -3% DGR scenario produces meaningfully lower income at every horizon — and compared to the flat case, the shortfall widens each year. At longer horizons, the shrinking-distribution case illustrates how NAV erosion at the underlying level translates upward through the wrapper even when DRIP is reinvesting every dollar at YMAX. Investors who have observed the YieldMax single-name funds' NAV trajectories since launch and want to model a continuation of that trend at the fund-of-funds level should run this case alongside the base and flat cases.

Limits of these projections

The calculator provides a clean, smooth projection — but YMAX's actual behavior depends on the aggregate behavior of fifteen-to-twenty underlying YieldMax sleeves, none of which is clean or smooth. Three structural limits are worth keeping in mind before relying on any long-horizon output.

The wrapper smooths variance but not the long-term trend

YMAX's weekly distribution stream is the reformatted output of its underlyings' monthly distributions, averaged across the equal-weight basket. Week-to-week variance at YMAX is meaningfully lower than month-to-month variance at any single underlying — a single sleeve's bad month is diluted by the other sleeves' contributions. That smoothing is real and useful for cash-flow planning. What the smoothing does not change is the long-term trend: if the weighted average of the underlying YieldMax funds experiences NAV erosion over a multi-year horizon, YMAX experiences the same erosion on aggregate. The wrapper is a variance-reduction layer, not a structural fix for the option-income payoff profile. The calculator assumes a smooth annualized stream; the smoothing matches YMAX's actual cadence reasonably well, but the projection table does not show the underlying NAV trend that will eventually flow through to per-share distributions.

The layered fee structure compounds against the holder

YMAX charges its own management fee on top of the underlying YieldMax ETFs' fees. The total expense load is the sum of the wrapper fee and the weighted average fee of the holdings, which runs materially higher than direct ownership of any single sleeve. The calculator's projection does not explicitly subtract a fee line item — it works from the realized net yield, which already reflects fees. But on a multi-decade compounding horizon, even a small incremental fee gap between YMAX and direct sleeve ownership compounds into a visible drag on terminal income. Investors comparing YMAX projections to projections for MSTY, NVDY, or a hand-rolled equal-weight basket of YieldMax sleeves should adjust the long-horizon outputs downward for YMAX to reflect the incremental fee load.

No five-year DGR exists for YMAX or the YieldMax universe

YMAX launched in 2024. The five-year DGR field in the computed data is null by definition. Most of YMAX's underlyings also have less than three years of operating history. The 7% DGR the calculator uses as a fallback is the same default applied to every ticker without a computed DGR — it has no specific relationship to YMAX's payout history or to the YieldMax universe's forward outlook. Users should treat long-horizon projections with extra caution and experiment with 0% and negative DGR values as alternative inputs. For taxable-account holders, also note that YMAX's distributions are largely classified as return of capital, which the calculator's after-tax view does not yet handle specially — the after-tax projection in the calculator treats distributions as ordinary income, understating the actual after-tax yield for taxable holders. Tax-advantaged account holders can disregard that caveat entirely.

Compare YMAX with another ticker

Compare functionality launching soon.

Open a brokerage account to start buying YMAX

Open a brokerage account in minutes — commission-free trades, no account minimum.

Get started →

Brokerage partner links coming soon — not active yet.

Sources & methodology

Dividend history and price data come from Polygon.io's reference and aggregates endpoints. Forward yield is computed as the sum of the most recent four cash distributions divided by the previous-close share price. The dividend growth rate shown on this page is the compound annual growth rate of total annual distributions across the available history in this snapshot.

Last updated: 2026-05-14.

Information here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past dividend history does not guarantee future payments. Verify all figures with the issuer or a registered financial advisor before making investment decisions.